Overview of
the Renewable Energy Sector in Bangladesh
Presented by
DR. M. EUSUF
Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS)
Dhaka
Renewable Energy
The most common definition is that renewable Energy is from an energy source that is replaced rapidly by the natural process. Renewable sources of energy are shown in the following Table :
New and Renewable Energy Technologies and Applications
|
Energy sources |
Liquid fuels |
Centralized electric power |
Decentralized power |
Heat |
||||||
|
1. |
Solar |
|
Thermal electric, photovoltaic, solar pond |
Thermal electric, photovoltaic |
Solar passive, Solar pond, Solar flat plate, Evacuated tube, Solar concentrators |
|||||
|
2. |
Geo-thermal |
|
Geothermal electric |
Geothermal small power |
Geothermal Direct heat |
|||||
|
3. |
Wind |
|
|
Wind electric |
Wind electric, Wind shaft |
|||||
|
4. |
Hydro-power |
|
Hydropower (including small hydro) |
Mini hydro Micro hydro |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Energy sources |
Liquid fuels |
Centralized electric power |
Decentralized power |
Heat |
||||||
|
5. |
Biomass Including biogas |
Ethanol, Methane Vegetable Oils |
Direct combustion |
1. Diesel Liquid biofuel |
1. Direct combustion |
|||||
|
6. |
Fuel-wood |
|
Direct combustion |
|
Direct combustion of wood and charcoal |
|||||
|
7. |
Oil shale and tar sands |
Syn-crude |
Shale burning |
|
Liquid fuel for cooking |
|||||
|
8. |
Ocean/ |
|
Tidal, OTEC, Wave |
Wave |
|
|||||
|
9. |
Draught animal |
|
|
Traction and shaft power |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy Consumption Pattern in 1990 (PJ)
|
Sector |
Non-renewable |
Renewable |
Total |
|
Domestic |
37.8 |
404.5 |
442.3 |
|
Industrial |
40.5 |
92.7 |
133.2 |
|
Commercial |
7.1 |
1.8 |
8.9 |
|
Transport |
27.5 |
0 |
27.5 |
|
Agriculture |
11.9 |
0 |
11.9 |
|
Non-energy use |
58.8 |
0 |
58.8 |
|
Others |
0.3 |
0 |
0.3 |
|
Total |
183.9 |
499.0 |
682.9 |


Electricity Generation
Installed Capacity (2003/04) - 4680 MW
Production Capacity (2003/04) - 3592 MW
Source Based Generation Pattern (2003/04:
Gas – 88.90%, Hydro – 3.99%, Liquid fuel – 7.11%,
Total generation = 20,062 GWh
Per Capita Generation – 153.77 kWh
Per Capita Consumption – 133.11 kWh
Available Non-renewable Energy Sources:
Natural Gas - 16.3 TCF
Coal - 1750 million tons
Peat - 171 million tons
Potential of Renewable Energy Sources
Solar 700 – 900 ´ 1018 J/year
Biogas 25 – 70 ´ 1015 J/year
Hydro power 1300 MW
Wind, tidal etc. Needs investigation
Status of Renewable Energy Technologies
|
Technology type |
Number installed |
Potential |
|
Improved stove |
Over 300,000 |
Above 20 million |
|
Biogas plant |
Over 50,000 m3 |
3675×106 m3 |
|
Solar Photovoltaic |
Over 3 MW |
50,436 MW |
|
Solar Drier |
Self made (Number not known) |
Needs investigation |
|
Solar Cooker |
Over 800 |
Needs study |
|
Solar water heater |
A few |
Needs study |
|
Wind Generator |
50 kW ? |
2,000 MW |
|
Briquetting machine |
Over 1000 |
Needs study |
|
Hydro |
230MW |
672MW |
|
Solar Thermal |
800m² |
20x106m2 |
|
Geothermal |
Nil |
Needs Investigation |
|
Energy Saving per year through Improved Stoves |
4.7 PJ |
312.5 PJ |
Immediate Steps Needed
a) To use biogas plants, efficient cooking appliances and solar lighting devices
b) To introduce improved cogeneration in sugar industries
c) To use city wastes for generation of power and biofertilizer and creation of better environment
d) To use poultry droppings for generation of power and biofertilizer helping expansion of poultry industry
Initiatives Already Undertaken
a) Conversion of petrol-driven vehicles to CNG-driven vehicles
b) All the petrol-lub-driven 3-wheelers in the Dhaka city have been converted making the city air much cleaner than before.
c) Introduction of efficient cooking stoves (BCSIR)
d) Introduction of biogas plants (BCSIR, LGED, IDCOL, Grameen Shakti, BRAC, SNV)
e) Introduction of Solar home systems (REB, IDCOL, Grameen Shakti, Rahim Afrooz, BRAC and others)
f) Introduction of wind generator (PDB. LGED)
g) Biogas plants based on poultry droppings (BCSIR, GTZ, BCAS).
Policy Initiatives
a) Bangladesh a signatory of UNFCCC.
b) UNFCCC ratified by GOB on 15 April 1994.
c) Established Ministry of Environment & Forest (MOEF) with two major departments, namely, Department of Environment (DOE) and Forest Department (FD).
d) Adapted an Environmental Policy in 1992, an Environment Protection Act in 1995 and a National Environment Management Action Plan (NEMAP) in 1996.
e) Under Environment Protection Act 1995, adapted Environment Protection Regulation, 1997,
f) Constituted an interministerial steering Committee with the Secretary, MOEF for implementation of UNFCCC Programme.
g) Formation of CDM Board, CDM Committee and CDM Secretariat.
2. PREGA
Asian Development Bank (ADB) has launched a project entitled “Promotion of Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Abatement – PREGA” in 2002 in some countries of South East Asia. The objectives of this project are :
a)
To promote investment in PREGA technologies that will
increase access to energy services by the poor,
reduce GHG
emissions and realize other strategic
development
activities.
b)
To generate a pipeline of investment projects for financing
through commercial, multilateral and bilateral
sources
including specialized treaty-linked mechanisms
such as
CDM and GEF.
c)
To identify policy and institutional barriers to
dissemination of PREGA technologies.
d)
To study and develop financing models for PREGA
investment projects.
Availability and Quality of Raw Materials
A large amount of wastes is generated daily in Dhaka city. Power Cell, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources (MEMR), under the sponsorship of the World Bank, commissioned in 1998 Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS) for quantity assessment and Institute of Fuel Research and Development (IFRD) of BCSIR for quality assessment of Dhaka city wastes. According to quantity assessment (BCAS, 1998), this city generated about 5000 tons of wastes daily in 2002 and the daily generation will increase to over 15000 tons in 2021. The projection of generation upto 2021 and composition & calorific values are shown in Tables below :
|
Year |
Wastes (kilo tonnes/day) |
Wastes (million tonnes/yr) |
|
2002 |
5.35 |
1.95 |
|
2003 |
5.65 |
2.06 |
|
2004 |
5.97 |
2.18 |
|
2005 |
6.30 |
2.30 |
|
2006 |
6.66 |
2.43 |
|
2007 |
7.03 |
2.57 |
|
2008 |
7.43 |
2.71 |
|
2009 |
7.84 |
2.86 |
|
2010 |
8.28 |
3.02 |
|
2011 |
8.75 |
3.19 |
|
2012 |
9.24 |
3.37 |
|
2013 |
9.76 |
3.56 |
|
2014 |
10.31 |
3.76 |
|
2015 |
10.89 |
3.97 |
|
2016 |
11.50 |
4.20 |
|
2017 |
12.15 |
4.43 |
|
2018 |
12.83 |
4.68 |
|
2019 |
13.55 |
4.95 |
|
2020 |
14.31 |
5.22 |
|
2021 |
15.11 |
5.52 |
Source: BCAS (1998)
|
Contents |
Share by weight |
|
Calorific Values |
Btu/lb |
kcal/kg |
|
Water (moisture) |
50%-70% |
As received |
1386-2600 |
770-1444 |
|
|
Carbon |
6.02%-26.06% |
Air dry (with moisture 5-8%) |
2900-4300 |
1611-2389 |
|
|
Hydrogen |
1.20%-3.53% |
Oven dry |
3200-6200 |
1833-3444 |
Source : IFRD (1998) and the Mission’s calculation
It is seen from these Tables that, although daily generation is large (5350 tonnes in 2002 and projected to rise to 15,110 tonnes in 2021), water content is rather high (60-70%). The ADB Mission, reviewing the state-of-the-art of available technologies and analyzing the quantity and quality of wastes recommends that landfill technology is the best choice for Dhaka city wastes.
Description of the Selected technology
1) 50 digesters, 8500m3 capacity each, are constructed.
2) 20-MW capacity generator is installed.
3) Generated electricity is fed into the national grid thus displacing equivalent power generation based on natural gas by BPDB.
4) Fresh wastes containing all the components including the recyclables such as metals, glasses, etc. will be fed into the digesters. After digestion, when the digested materials will be dug out, scavengers with necessary safety measures will be employed to pick up the recyclable materials. After anaerobic digestion, the residue becomes completely odourless and mostly germ-free. The sorted-out residue will be disposed of for land filling.
5) Methane produced in otherwise open dumping will be trapped and burnt for power generation
6) With the project activity, total yearly CO2 production is 153, 670 tonnes.
Flow diagramme for the selected process

GHG (CO2 equivalent) Production without (Series 2) and with (Series 1) the project activity

Yearly Total Production of CO2 Equivalent from the Matuail Site and 20-MW Power Plant Based on Natural Gas in the Absence of Project Activity
|
Yearly Production of CO2 from 20-MW Power Plant |
= |
101,092 |
Tonnes |
|
Yearly Production from the Matuail Dumping Site (With daily unloading of 5000 tonnes of Wastes) |
= |
1,183,076 |
Tonnes |
|
Total |
= |
1,284,168 |
Tonnes |
Yearly Total Reduction of CO2 Equivalent in the Presence of Project Activity
|
i) |
Yearly total production of CO2 equivalent in the absence of the project activities |
|
1,284,168 |
Tonnes |
|
ii) |
Yearly total production of CO2 with the project activity |
= |
153,630 |
Tonnes |
|
|
|
= |
1,130,538 |
Tonnes |
Financial Aspects (MSWEE)
Base case
Investment cost : 1573.66 million Taka
Annual operating cost : 61.8 million Taka
IRR : –6%
NPV (at 10%) : -77.57 million Taka
B-C Ratio (at 10%) : 0.81
Financial Analysis with Carbon Benefit (1.13 million tons of CO2 Reduction per annum) -MSWEE
With 5 dollars per ton of CO2
IRR = 84.02%
NPV (at 10%) = 2136.99 million Taka
B-C ratio (at 10%) = 6.2
with 3 dollars per ton of CO2
IRR = 54.73%
NPV (at 10%) = 1251.79 million Taka
B-C ratio (at 10%) = 4.4
Project benefits (MSWEE)
|
Issues |
Explanation |
|
Local Environmental Benefits |
- Local air quality will be improved.
- The project will deliver more
electricity to the grid - The project will help solve waste disposal problem |
|
Socio-economic Benefits |
- The project will lead to employment generation.
- The project will improve the quality of
life of |
|
Capacity Building |
- This project will be a first CDM project
in the |
|
Issues |
Explanation |
|
Technology Transfer |
- This will be a new technology in the
region |
|
Host Country Criteria |
- GOB is still in the process of defining
|
|
Government Priority |
- This project is in the priority list of
GOB and |
|
EIA |
- EIA will be carried out as per Law. |
Other Economic and Social Benefits
-
l Job creation : New jobs will be created through
landfill project. -
l Income generation : Incremental wage increase at land-
fill energy plant compared to
alternative jobs. -
l Trade Balance : Positive trade balance due to
reduction of fuel import. -
l Efficient use of land : Density of waste in land fill project
is higher than present dump-site.
The higher the density, the better is
the land use. -
l Renewable Energy : It is renewable.
-
l The project will lead to technology transfer and which can
be replicated.

Figure
10.2: BCR at different biogas plant sizes and sale of
products
(e = 4.71 Tk/kWh, g = 300 Tk/connection, f = 0.80 Tk/kg)


