Skip to main content.
Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Programme by 

Please visit........

Productivity Improvement in Industry through Energy Efficiency Programs (Sustainable Energy for Development,  A Project Supported by GTZ )

Feasibility Study on Biogas from Poultry Droppings in Bangladesh   [GTZ-PURE/Power Cell/Sustainable Energy Unit (SEU), GTZ Priority Area ( Energy). Energy for Development (SED)  in Bangladesh.  Project Name:  Promotion of Biogas Production and Use in Commercial Establishment , Prepared By - Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS), in collaboration with Energy Consulting Services (ECS), December 28, 2005)]

Primary Field Survey Report  PROMOTION OF MODERN DRYING TECHNOLOGIES  IN RURAL AREAS OF BANGLADESH  Funded by GTZ  

Promotion of Biogas Production and Use in Commercial Establishment by GTZ-PURE/Power Cell/Sustainable Energy Unit (SEU)  

 SUSTAINABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (SEDEC) - under implementation / Proposed . Please click here

Assessment of present status of LPG systems and its market potential in Bangladesh

Present Energy Scenario in Bangladesh

Market Report on Renewable Energy Technologies in Bangladesh, By Prokaushali Sangsad Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh, February 23, 2006

Pilot Project on Implementation of Eco- Efficiency Measures in Garments Factories ( Energy Saving by Replacement of Magnetic Ballasts with Electronic Ballasts in Readymade Garments Factories in Bangladesh (Project number: 83010242 )

 

 

 

 

 

GTZ in Bangladesh

Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Programme

 

Project description

Title: Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Programme
Client: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ)
Country: Bangladesch
Lead executing agency: Power Division, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources (MPEMR)
Overall term: March 2007 to February 2010

Context

Houses, shops and factories in Bangladesh are frequently in darkness. Households and small and medium enterprises in rural areas are especially hard-hit; several of these have no hope of connecting to the grid. The productivity of those who do have access to electricity is adversely affected by daily power cuts. Inefficient appliances and a faulty electricity network also account for significant energy losses. Although the government has acknowledged the pressing need for greater energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy sources, the implementation of relevant programmes remains problematic. Many public institutions and stakeholders responsible for implementation lack the expertise to overcome the current energy crisis.

Objective

The decentralisation of renewable energy supplies to households and businesses has improved and available energy is used more efficiently. Poorer families, too, are in a position to replace appliances such as traditional stoves and kerosene lamps, which are obsolete and pose serious health hazards.

Approach

Poverty reduction depends on development, which in turn depends on energy. To ensure that Bangladesh’s population receives an improved energy supply, it is important to first create an enabling environment. The programme supports the government with regard to the anticipated change processes. Public institutions are advised on policy and strategy development and energy providers prepared for technical innovations. Stakeholders such as trade associations and civil society organisations are informed about the technical and financial aspects of projects to introduce renewable energies and enhance energy efficiency. The programme supports the use of energy-saving appliances and production processes and promotes the dissemination of technologies based on renewables, such as solar energy systems and biogas plants.

Results achieved so far

Solar energy plants are being established more rapidly in Bangladesh than in any other country in the world. The government is in the process of setting up a coordination centre for the promotion of renewable energy. A turnaround in public opinion will guarantee the sustainability of the change in course. The rural poor are given microcredits to help them purchase solar panels. Improvements in the energy supply open up new prospects for the socioeconomic development of the poor. Children can read and study in the evenings and, thanks to modern cooking devices, women are spared the harmful effects of smoke from open fires. Natural resources are conserved and toxic emissions curbed. 

 

Download

Promotion of the Use of Renewable Energies (PURE)

Promoting Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

Promoting Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency [ pdf 763.02 kb ]


Solar Energy to key to Rural Development in Bangladesh
GTZ Priority Area ( Energy). Energy for Development (SED)

Solar Energy to key to Rural Development in Bangladesh [pdf 503.05 kb ]


Mobilizing the Market for Biogas technology
GTZ Priority Area ( Energy). Energy for Development (SED)

Mobilizing the Market for Biogas technology [pdf 519.97 kb ]



Sustainable Energy Development(SED) Field progress report :

Until July, 2008,

Improved Cook Stoves(ICS) isntallation :


Domestic Improved Cook Stoves(ICS) = 66000

Institutional ICS = 1000


Solar Home System :

SHS ( Implemented by IDCOL partner organizations, 23Wp+ IDCOL) = 46184

Small Solar Home System (SSHS) , PURE = 1500 , SED (IDCOL) = 1379

MSHS, 7.5 Wp = 500


Biogas installation :

Big size biogas plant( Big Biogas plant 6 m3) ,PURE = 270 , SED (IDCOL) = 809

Pilot biogas plant = 5


Training Imparted (person):

Improved Cook Stoves(ICS) = 3924

Solar Home System (SHS) = 428

Biogas = 850
 

 

Promotion of the Use of Renewable Energies (PURE)

 

Final Report on -

 

Appraisal of patterns and options for change of energy use in and around selected national parks Submitted to GTZ, Dhaka

 

- by Prokaushali Sangsad Ltd House-4, Road-6, Block-C, Banani Dhaka, Bangladesh June 2005

 

 

CONTENTS

 

Executive Summary

 

Chapter 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 

1.1         Project area and the problem of deforestation  ...................................................................... 3 

1.2         Study Methodology  .............................................................................................................. 5
 

Chapter 2 Review of socio-economic condition and energy usage pattern in the A Socio-Economic and Fuel use related Information for Chunuti  project area  7
 

 Wildlife Sanctuary and Teknaf Game Reserve  7

2.1         Socio-economic information on Chunuti .............................................................................. 7

2.2         Fuel Related Information: (Chunuti)  .................................................................................. 15

2.3         Socio-Economic Information (Teknaf): .............................................................................. 19 

2.4         Fuel Related Information: (Teknaf)  .................................................................................... 24

 

B.  Wood Collection As An Occupation                                                                   26

C.  Commercial Units Using Cooking Fuel:                                                               29
 

D.  Use Of Fuel Wood In Brick Fields:  30

 

 Chapter 3 Energy efficient end-use devices and available appropriate renewable energy technologies  ..............  34
 

 Chapter 4  Awareness Program: Exhibition at Chunuti on Alternative Energy sources  ...................... 36

 

 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations  ................................................................................... 39
 

 

 Conclusions  39
 

 Recommendations  41
 

Annex-1  Terms of Reference for the assignment

Annex-2  Laws on forest, construction and brickfields

Annex-3  Some designs of improved stoves used around the world

Annex-4  Some information materials distributed at the Chunuti Exhibition

Prokaushali Sangsad Ltd.           2

 

Acronyms

 

BEPP Bangladesh Energy Planning Project

BCSIR Bangladesh Council for Scientific and Industrial Research

CBO  Community Based Organization

CODEC Community Development Center

CDM Clean Development Mechanism

DFO District Forest Officer

FD  Forest Department

FGD  Focus Group Discussion

GEF Global Environmental Facility

GD Group Discussion

GO  Government Organization

GOB Government of Bangladesh

GR  Game Reserve

GTZ German Technical Cooperation

IFRD Institute of Fuel Research and Development

LGED Local Government Engineering Department

LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas

NACOM Nature Conservation Management

NGO Non Government Organization

NSP Nishorgo Support Project

PURE Promotion of the Use of Renewable Energies

VERC Village Education Resource Center

WS  Wildlife Sanctuary

 

Appraisal of Patterns and Options for Change of Energy Use in and Around Selected National Parks

 

Executive Summary

 

The study focuses on the energy needs of predominantly poor rural communities living in and around Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary in Chittagong and the Teknaf Game Reserve in Cox's Bazar Districts. Life in these two areas and the nearby reserve forests depend heavily on the forest resources for energy consumption and earning a livelihood. This has contributed to alarmingly endangering the sustainability of the local environment, including the green vegetation and the animal population. Considering the significant scope of preventing environmental degradation of the area by appropriate energy interventions, Prokaushali Sangsad Ltd. had been given the assignment by GTZ, Dhaka to investigate the scope of improving energy usage patterns that can reduce the burden on the forest resources.

 

This project aims to complement the ongoing activities of forest reserve conservation and protection of the national parks initiated by USAID and implemented by the Forest Department under the Nishorgo Support Project.  It is envisioned that co-management of the protected area with participation of local of people will result in long term sustainability of the natural resources. On the other hand, energy demand of the local people is possibly a key element responsible for degradation of the forests. 

 

Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary (WS), in the range of tropical evergreen forests of Bangladesh, is situated about 70 Km south of the Chittagong city covering parts of five Upazilas. Chunuti WS was formally established through a Gazette Notification in 1986 under the provision of Wildlife preservation Act covering an area of 19,177 acres. When looking at the Sanctuary from the top of the watchtower, no trees or bushes can be seen on the hills where the wild life can live, since most of the trees have been cut down with only a few mature trees remaining. Many betel leaf and paddy cultivation and some bamboo bushes are the only vegetation around.  The Teknaf Game Reserve (GR) is situated in the Teknaf peninsula in the southeastern part of Bangladesh, bordered on the east by Naf River and on the west by the Bay of Bengal. The reserve includes 5 unions of Teknaf Upazila.

 

Although the Wildlife Sanctuary and the Game Reserve has been planned to preserve a habitat for a large diversity of wildlife, most of the animals have disappeared or have drastically decreased in numbers in recent years. Moreover, there is no boundary demarcation to indicate that they are protected areas. 

 

This study has been assigned the task of assessment and evaluation of (A) energy usage pattern of the residents and other relevant stakeholders, and (B) assessment of the existing energy demand and supply situation. It also provides recommendations on (A) energy efficient equipment, and (B) acceptable and affordable fuel switching options for (i) household, (ii) commercial, and (iii) industrial users in the area. 

 

Household survey of the national parks: Under this assignment a survey was conducted on 137 households from Chunuti and 220 from Teknaf parks to gather information on the energy usage pattern and associated demand and supply situation. The survey gave an indication on the economic condition of the people and dependency of the locality on the

 

i

reserve forest and the wildlife sanctuary for their livelihood. According to the survey about 67% of the households in Chunuti and 85% in Teknaf own less than 50 decimal land as homestead or none at all. However, a significant number illegally own large areas of cultivable land inside the parks, indicating wood lots are being cleared for agricultural purposes contributing to reduction of forest resources. Selling fuel wood is a source of income for the people, apart from agricultural labour and business. Most of the income is spent on food, indicating the low income level of the households. Promotion of other income generating activities is thus essential for persuading these people from destroying the remaining trees and plants in and around the sanctuary. The survey showed only 21% of the households had some savings while about 43% households had taken loan from informal and formal sources, which had to be repaid.

 

The survey and focus group discussions both indicated that most of the households would be interested in switching to alternative fuels if they were affordable and available. A significant 90% of the households in Chunuti, and 92% in Teknaf, expressed their willingness to use alternative fuel. However the capability for spending extra money depended on their economic conditions. It is seen that about 24% in Chunuti and 32% in Teknaf could not pay anything or spend less than Tk.50 per month.  To encourage energy savings, this group could be offered credit for purchase of efficient cooking devices. However about 48% in Chunuti and 23% in Teknaf could pay enough to buy much more efficient fuels such as kerosene, i.e. more than Tk. 201-500 per month. Most probably they are already spending about this much on fuelwood, unless using from land owned by them. This group could be encouraged and assisted with micro-credit for switching over to efficient technology like the kero-stoves or other devices using fossil fuel, or using fuel saving devices that would reduce the consumption of biomass. 

Betel leaf is a perennial seasonal cash crop that grows well in the area in and around the Chunuti WS, where 22% of the households cultivate betel leaf, while only 5% in Teknaf. Financially solvent people own most of the betel leaf plantations in that area. These plantations require a significant amount of fencing and support for the climbing plants involving substantial investments. Most of the fences are renewable every year, which are made of bamboo sticks, fuel wood, and branches of trees. In Chunuti on average, each cultivator spends more than Tk.15,000 for making fences, shades and supports for betel leaf, at least some of which comes from the reserves. To reduce the use of bamboo and other plants from the sanctuary, use of “dhaincha” as fencing material can be recommended. Dhaincha has the added advantage of being a nitrogen fixer for the soil, increasing fertility of the betel leaf crop.

 

The survey carried out by PSL was designed to gain an idea about the way fuel wood collected from the area inside and surrounding Chunuti WS and Teknaf GR is integrated as a part of the life of the people. Almost 99% of total sample of 357 households are found to use fuel wood, although some in conjunction with other biomass fuel. About 88% of the households are willing to plant fuel wood trees to fulfil their own fuel wood needs. Introduction of “dhaincha”, a special plant for fuel wood supply on seasonal basis may be acceptable by majority of households since they could grow in the homesteads. The exhibition arranged during the study period in Chunuti confirms this view.  Average amount of fuelwood used per household in dry season and rainy season was found to be 10 kg/day and 14 kg/day respectively. This amounts to a per capita use of 450kg/person/year for dry season and 650 kg/person/year for rainy season. In Chunuti 65% of the households collect biomass fuels for cooking from common sources like the

ii

reserve forest area, while only 19% claim to use their own sources, probably the trees grown in homesteads. In future, possibility of augmenting the supply of biomass from within homesteads, and efficient devices may help to change their present habit of collecting fuel wood from reserve forest.

 

Typically all rural households in Bangladesh use earthen stoves made by the women themselves, using any kind of available and easy to burn biomass fuel in the open fire. These are very inefficient in terms of fuel use and produce large amounts of smoke all the time. The women sit on the floor while cooking and sometimes look after small children at the same time. Depending on the size of the kitchen and the season of use, the stoves are built either indoors or outdoors. Single burner earthen stoves are more popular in the study area. In the 137 surveyed households in Chunuti, 182 and 56 single burner stoves were found to be located inside and outside the kitchen respectively. Only 3 homes used kerosene stoves and a single one used a LPG stove. In Teknaf, 408 single burner stoves were found inside the kitchen compared to only 48 outside. However no kerosene stove or LPG usage could be seen. This shows the extremely high dependence on biomass energy for cooking, and exposure of women and children to harmful indoor air pollution. Promoting use of improved cooking stoves can reduce the biomass consumption to some extent, while eliminating smoke related illnesses. 

 

It has been found that 15% of the households in Chunuti and 4 % in Teknaf use cow dung as a cooking fuel. People dry the dung into small patties or on sticks and sundry for use in the rainy season. This gives a temporary solution for the energy problem, but results in destroying the natural land quality by depriving it of useful nutrients, which would have been recycled into the soil otherwise. Although majority of the households use animal dung as fertilizer, many use it both as fuel and fertilizer. In both locations, about 17% owned 5 or more cattle. This particular group may able to install biogas plant from the point of view of daily availability of dung to run a family size biogas plant. In addition, scope for investing in community sized biogas plants should also be investigated. 

 

93% of the households in Chunuti and 75% in Teknaf use kerosene for lighting, which indicates availability of kerosene in the local area. Even though the quality of light is better in case of electricity than for kerosene wick lamps, most households use kerosene lamps. These are mainly uncovered wick lamps called kupi, and the more safer and efficient glass domed "hurricane" lamps. Average monthly expenditure for kerosene is Tk. 200 compared to Tk. 300 spent for electricity used by 3%.  In the recent times the government has taken up several projects for household electrification using solar home systems. Although the households in the study area are poor, with a properly designed and implemented credit program, a substantial number could be brought under the solar home system program in case the grid service is unavailable.

 

Occupational wood collection: Two types of wood collection processes were observed within the survey areas. The first one includes those who collect wood for their own needs. These people mostly collect the regenerative part of the trees, which takes place on a daily basis. Their collection probably does not affect deforestation. On the other hand, the second group collects wood for commercial reasons. They are the illegal fellers who gather both the timber and all other parts of the trees. They are the main contributors to deforestation. As the wood collection from reserve forest is an illegal act, it is done covertly, and thus it is not possible to identify the exact number of people involved in

 

iii

wood collection. Considering the impact of wood collection process on deforestation and their importance in any program for sustainable management of forest, 15 persons involved in wood collection were identified, all of whom are engaged in this activity for more than 10 years. In fact none of them started this occupation within the last 5 years indicating that during these years there were not many trees left in the forest for people to start a living. It is known from experience that timber wood is more valuable than fuel wood and 66% reported to collect fuel wood and timber together. So a collector would prefer to collect more timber wood than fuel wood to maximize his income. But the collection of timber wood involves felling of standing trees and it is more visible to the forest department and the society at large. The collection of timber wood is also constrained by the availability of mature trees. 73% of the collectors who collect more than 2 head loads i.e. more than 50 kg of fuel wood, probably engage vans to carry them. Although majority earn about Tk. 2000 per month, some are earning as much as Tk. 4500 from this business. Lack of law enforcement is the primary reason for continuation of occupational wood collection.  93% of the wood collectors reported lack of employment as the primary reason for their involvement, and expressed their willingness to end it if possible. Therefore scope for alternative source of income generation for these people is essential and may be the only way to limit this activity. 

 

Use of fuel wood for commercial purposes: The two main types of commercial units surveyed to estimate their energy use pattern in Chunuti and Teknaf are 21 tea stalls and 1 hotel. These are the two main types of establishments using fuel for cooking in these areas. 89% of the surveyed commercial units purchased fuel wood and the others collected it from the local area. While 32% reported use of fuel wood, 18% used kerosene and 50% used both fuel wood and kerosene and the choice depends on the convenience of the owner. Average daily expenditure on fuelwood and kerosene is about Tk. 50 and Tk.56 respectively. High efficiency fuel like briquette, or solar cooker for preheating can be useful for the owners of commercial enterprises, who are willing to use any improved device that can reduce their dependency on fuel wood.

 

Use of fuel wood in brick fields: Brick making is an energy intensive industry and consumes large quantities of fuel wood. It is a well-known fact that brick burning with fuel wood contributes to deforestation. The Government of Bangladesh enacted the Brick Burning (control) law in 1989 to ban the use of fuel wood for burning of bricks. In addition to contributing to deforestation, the brickfields in Chunuti and Teknaf areas are also cutting down hills for the earth required for brick making. Thus these are having a significant negative impact on the local environment. It may be mentioned that according to The Building Construction Act of 1952, cutting of hills is illegal. In Chunuti 5 brickfields out of 15 were surveyed and 1 out of 6 were surveyed in Teknaf. It was possible to obtain some information on field operations but data on amount of wood fuel or coal used could not be verified. The annual production of bricks by all brickfields located in Chunuti and Teknaf is estimated as 50.4 million. Each brickfield provides seasonal employment to about 150 persons in the area.  According to the Bangladesh Energy Planning Project (BEPP), GOB 1985, requirement of fuel wood and coal is 76 tons and 30.48 tons respectively for 100,000 bricks. It can be inferred that the quantity of fuel wood required to burn bricks is almost double than that of coal. The survey has also found that the brickfield owners collect 50% of clay materials from local hillocks and 50% from outside the area, damaging the environment significantly.

iv

 

All the surveyed brickfields are located inside the reserve forest area. But according to Brick Burning (control) law of 1989, no brickfield can be established within the 3 km area of the reserve forest area. Therefore brickfields should not be permitted in the vicinity of forest area at all. Moreover, according to the law, it is illegal to use fuel wood in brick industries throughout Bangladesh. It is proposed that permanent billboards be placed in the access area announcing the legal implications and laws to increase awareness of the local people. Seminars and discussion meetings need to be arranged to mobilise public opinion and take legal action if necessary against this illegal activity.

Outreach and demonstration:  An outreach program was designed to introduce alternative energy options to the general population in and around Chunuti wildlife sanctuary. The objective of this exhibition was to initiate interest and awareness among the people to shift from firewood in particular, and to improve their energy usage pattern to more sustainable alternatives. The program was attended by high level officials of the District Forest Department, local government officials, representatives of GTZ and Nishorgo support project, teachers and students from local colleges, schools and Madrasa, officials from the local NGOs and general public from surrounding areas.

The proposed technology interventions for the project include more efficient end use devices and appliance like improved stoves, pressure cookers, etc., making different types of conventional fuels available in the market like Kerosene or LPG with stoves, for people to chose from according to their capability and priority. Other appropriate technologies like bio gas plants, briquettes have also been introduced along with the scope of cultivation of different kind of biomass fuels like dhaincha. Low cost solar dryer, solar cookers and solar home system for lighting are also useful technologies on case specific basis.

 

One of the main purposes of this study is to recommend on energy efficient devices for the area to reduce the degradation of the forest, especially the Game Reserve and the Wildlife Sanctuary. The study has shown that 90-100% of the households and all the commercial units that work with cooking activities use fuel wood in a traditional way. For many of them the firewood is free, although it has to be collected by people. Even then the average amount of fuel wood used in the households is far more than in other parts of the country. Reducing wastage and improving efficiency in conversion of energy and switching to other types of fuel can help in loss of vegetation in the parks and the surrounding forests. Acceptance of any recommendations will depend on the success of awareness and promotional programs for introducing the technologies.

 

It is estimated that annual fuel wood consumption in Chunuti and Teknaf area are approximately 81,123 tons and 122,218 tons respectively. A training course on production of improve stoves with high efficiency will have quick and direct impact on reducing fuel wood consumption.

There is a need for awareness building at all levels of the population in the area. An ‘Energy Service and Information Centre on alternative energy options can be set up in Chunuti to promote technologies designed to reduce the growing pressure on the wildlife sanctuary. NSP could gain from hosting the centre by providing more knowledge on the alternatives and maintaining some products on energy efficiency for sale to the public.

 

The urgent need for supplying Dhaincha seeds for growing as an alternative for fuel wood can be done through the Energy Service and Information Centre or other existing outlets. During the initial period seeds can be sold to the public at a reduced price to create interest. Nishorgo agricultural extension could follow upon this. Similarly, commercial availability of briquette could be ensured with increasing demand. The private sector producer could be encouraged to stock some briquette near the park areas.

 

Micro Credit for home based use of improved fuel, stoves and appliances could be promoted in the area through some local NGOs that are already active in the area. There will also be a need for finance for carrying out all the activities recommended in this report.

 

Technology innovation should work simultaneously with, creative financing and market development, and the monitoring of actual environmental and health benefits. The programs should also incorporate participatory approaches involving local women to correctly address users' priorities and preferences. This aspect of integrated development approach has to be kept in mind during any follow up activity taken up after this study. An Action Plan with a schedule for implementation of the activities mentioned in this report and possible stakeholder participation has been proposed. The time frame takes into account the necessity of long term commitment required for success of such projects.

 

Priority level has been determined by the expected scale of the impact, qualitative significance of the output and timing considerations.

 

 

Chapter 1 Introduction

In today's world energy is an essential element for fulfilling the basic needs of a society. Depending on the prevailing socio economic conditions, the demand for energy resources varies in quality and quantity. The present study focuses on the energy needs of predominantly poor rural communities living in and around Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary in Chittagong and the Teknaf Game Reserve in Cox's Bazar Districts. Life in these two areas and the nearby reserve forests depend heavily on the forest resources for energy consumption and earning a livelihood for majority of the population. This has contributed to alarmingly endangering the sustainability of the local environment, including the green vegetation and the animal population.

Considering the significant scope of preventing environmental degradation of the area by appropriate energy intervention, Prokaushali Sangsad Ltd. had been given the assignment entitled "Appraisal of patterns and options for change of energy use in and around selected national parks" by GTZ, Dhaka, under its "Promotion of the Use of Renewable Energies (PURE)" program in Bangladesh. 

This project aims to complement the ongoing activities of forest reserve conservation and protection of the national parks initiated by USAID and implemented by the Department of Forest of the Government of Bangladesh, under the Nishorgo Support Project (NSP).  It is apprehended that energy demand of the local people is possibly one of the key elements responsible for degradation of the forests. Therefore, with a properly designed approach, comanagement of the protected area with participation of local of people may result in long-term sustainability of the natural resources.

1.1 Project area and the problem of deforestation

Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary (WS)

Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary (WS), in the range of tropical evergreen forests of Bangladesh, is situated at about 70 Km south of the Chittagong city on the west side of Chittagong-Cox’s

Bazar highway. The GPS locations for the Sanctuary are 21040N and 92007E. There are 7 unions in the Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary (Chunuti, Adhunagar, Herbang, Puichari, Banskhali, Borohatia, Toitong) of Banskhali and Lohagara Upazila of Chittagong Distirict and Chokoria Upazila of Cox’s Bazar District.     

Chunuti WS as formally established through a Gazette Notification in 1986 under the provision of Wildlife preservation Act. As per the Gazette Notification the Wildlife Sanctuary covers an area of 7763.94 ha or 19177 acres. In the past the sanctuary was under the jurisdiction of Chittagong (south) Forest Division, but recently it has been transferred to the newly created Wildlife and Nature Conservation Division of the Forest Department. Officially, the Sanctuary is divided between the two forest ranges of Jaldi and Chunuti.     

The Sanctuary area is commonly hilly to mountainous with shallow to deep gullies and gentle to steep slopes. The average height of the hilly area is 30 to 90 M.  There is no tree left in the hills except some mother-trees. The survey team did not see any animals in the sanctuary but were informed that there were elephants inside this area.  Sometimes elephants from the sanctuary come into the residential area in search of food. There is an acute shortage of edible vegetation such as banana or bamboo plants and other types of trees that the animals can eat.

A total of 178 species of wildlife species  (Amphibians: 6, Reptiles: 8, Birds: 137 and mammals: 27) were recorded in 1990 (Husain 1991; Feeroz 1991). This number reduced to 53 species in 1997 (FRMP, 1997). It seems that fifty percent of the wildlife of this area were lost within seven years. In 1990, Chunuti had the second largest gibbon population in the country (Feeroz 1991; Feeroz and Islam 1992; Ahsan1994). Ninety percent of this population disappeared from this area by 2003 (Islam et al 2004).

In recent years many people have started to illegally occupy land inside the sanctuary to build houses and for cultivation of crops, mainly for betel leaf. Most of the trees have been cut down with only a few mother trees remaining. When looking at the Sanctuary from the top of the watchtower, no trees or bushes can be seen on the hills where the wild life can live. Many betel leaf fields and some bamboo bushes are the only vegetation seen from the watchtower. 

There are 6 Brickfields in and around the Sanctuary area. Most of the brickfields use only fuel wood to meet their energy demand, though some claim to use coal sometimes. 

Teknaf Game Reserve (GR)

The Teknaf Game Reserve (GR) is situated in the Teknaf peninsula in the southeastern part of Bangladesh, bordered on the east by Naf River and on the west by the Bay of Bengal. The Reserve measures roughly about 28 km north-south and 3-5 km east west and lies in between

20052-21009N and 92008-92018E . The reserve includes 5 unions of Teknaf Upazila, namely, Baharchara, Hnilla, Sabrang, Teknaf and Whykong and part of Zaliapalong Union of Ukhia Upazila of the Cox’s Bazar district. A metalled road runs along the entire eastern length of the forest from north to south. Several other earthen and brick soled roads transverse the forest from east to west.   

Teknaf GR is part of the former Teknaf Reserved forest, and was formally established through a gazette notification in 1983. By the government notification, it covers a comparatively large area of 11,615 ha which is the 66.08% of total forest covered under Cox’s Bazar Forest division. The aim of the Game Reserve is to preserve a habitat for a large diversity of wildlife. There is no boundary demarcation to indicate that Teknaf GR is a protected area.        

Topographically, the GR consists of the hilly range that forms the backbone of the narrow peninsula. The range runs along north-south direction and parts of the range reach an altitude as high as about 700m from sea level. The soil consists of primarily clay to clay loam on level grounds and from sandy loam to coarse sand on hilly lands. The terrain of the Teknaf GR is exceedingly irregular and slops are often precipitous. In some sections, the hills abut directly to the sea beach along the western boundary. Deep gullies and narrow valleys are found in the area, drained by numerous streams that flow down to the Naf towards east and the Bay of Bengal towards the west. The streams are very shallow and most of them are seasonal, discharging water during monsoon and dry up during dry months.     

The Teknaf GR has been broadly classified as tropical evergreen or semi-evergreen forest. The long rotational tall trees located in deep valleys and shaded slopes, are dominated by garjan, chapalish, jarul, teak, gamar etc. The short rotational and new plantations are located near the peripheral areas. 

It is not only the trees and hills that dominate the GR, but also the fauna makes the area different. The wild and mighty elephant is one of the particular attractions of the GR. Once bison, sumbur, barking deer, leopard, Bengal Tiger, panthar and other animals were spread all over the GR. However, most of these animals have disappeared or have drastically decreased in numbers in recent years.

The pattern of usage of land is varied and wide. These are natural and planted forests, agriculture, housing, livestock and fisheries. An estimate shows that forests cover 42.1%, rivers cover 0.4%, cultivated areas cover 46.5%, and permanent crop fields cover 4.5% of the total area. 

1.2 Study Methodology

GTZ assigned this project to PSL in December 2004 to identify the role of demand for energy in the deforestation of the national parks and investigate the scope of improving energy usage patterns that can reduce the burden on the forest resources. In the first stage of the project, Teknaf Game Reserve and Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary parks have been selected for the above assessment, out of 4 focus areas under the Nishorgo Support Project (NSP). Significant data on these two locations were available from the appraisal studies1,2 carried out earlier for the project. This study utilised some of the available data and gathered additional primary information needed for the assessment, using questionnaire surveys and group discussions. The Terms of Reference is given at ANNEX –1.

The study concentrated on the following tasks to recommend a set of measures for reducing over-exploitation of forest resources in the parks.

1.         Assessment and evaluation of (A) energy usage pattern of the residents and other relevant stakeholders, (B) assessment of the existing energy demand and supply situation

2.         Providing recommendations on (A) energy efficient equipment, and (B) acceptable and affordable fuel switching options for (i) household, (ii) commercial, and (iii) industrial users in the area.

 

The methodology consisted of the following:

•           Background study of available field level appraisal reports and other information

•           Information collection through questionnaire surveys of households, commercial enterprises, fuel wood collectors and brick field owners around the parks

•           A 2-day exhibition in Chunuti for awareness building and demonstration of alternative fuels and efficient devices

•           Recommendations for reversing the present trend in deforestation using energy related interventions.

 

1 Site Level Field Appraisal for Protected Area Co-Management: Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary

2 Site Level Field Appraisal for Protected Area Co-Management: Teknaf Game Reserve

On 22 December 2005 an introductory launching meeting between PSL team leaders, GTZ officials, NSP staff, IRG team and other NGO (CODEC) participants took place to highlight the objectives of this study. The liaison between the field staff and management staff proved to be very helpful in project start up and execution. 

Initial visit to Chunuti and Teknaf sites by two of the team members of PSL was made on 26 December 2005 to make an initial assessment of the general area and planning for survey locations. A total of 352 household samples were collected during the survey from about 40 villages.

Questionnaires were prepared by the PSL team incorporating comments from GTZ and NSP. Separate survey questionnaires were prepared to determine the energy usage pattern and search for alternative fuels and devices for each of the following categories of users:

1. Households located within and adjacent to the national parks

2. Small commercial units in the vicinity

3. Brickfield owners using the forest resources

4. Fuel-wood collectors

 

The survey teams consisted of PSL staff, NGO staff, and local educated young people to assist in communication in the local dialects. The members were trained in filling up of the questionnaires and in conducting group discussions. 

 After data processing and analysis, a team of two persons from PSL went to Chunuti on March th, 2005 to select the most viable location and plan the logistics needed for the exhibition. The survey group and technical team arranged the extremely successful exhibition for awareness building. The objective of this exhibition was to initiate interest and awareness among the people to shift from firewood in particular, and to improve their energy usage pattern to more sustainable alternatives. Renewable and non-renewable energy options were considered for alternative fuels. The two-day event took place on March 21-22, 2005.

Chapter 2         Review of Socio-Economic Condition and Energy Usage Pattern in the Project Area

A         Socio-Economic and Fuel use related Information for Chunuti Wildlife Sanctuary and Teknaf Game Reserve

The socio-economic information collected during the study was intended to add to the qualitative information already available from the previous studies carried out under the Nishorgo Support Project. The main focus was to know about the economic conditions and how much the locality depended upon the reserve forest and the wildlife sanctuary for their livelihood. The survey brief survey of 137 households from Chunuti and 220 from Teknaf parks, gathered some information on the land ownership, type of dwellings, sources of income, household expenditure on fuel and other items, savings patterns, willingness and ability to switch to alternative fuels, etc. 

2.1       Socio-economic information on Chunuti

2.1.1    Land ownership

Distribution of households according to ownership of residential land, size of homestead wood lot, and agricultural land is shown in Fig: Ch.1a, Ch.1b, and Ch.1c respectively.

Figure Ch.1a shows that a substantial proportion of the households (67%) own just less than 50 decimal land as homestead or none at all. About 24% own a small plot of 51 to 100 decimal who probably use it as a homestead woodlot as well, as evident from Fig Ch.1b. Those who have larger plots all use it as woodlots. There are several households (7% of households) who own more than 150 decimal of land used for woodlots as seen from Fig. Ch.1b.

Fig Ch.1.c shows that about 33% of the households did not own any agricultural land but more households are seen to own larger sizes of agricultural land as opposed to woodlots. It is thus clear that woodlots are being cleared for agricultural purposes contributing to reduction of forest resources.

2.1.2 Type of building materials used in the Chunuti area:

In rural areas building materials used for the construction of houses can be considered as a proxy indicator of the economical condition of the households. Distribution of the households has been shown in the Fig:Ch.2 according to the apparent ascending order of economic level.

The very poor households using earthen wall and straw roof accounted for 38% of the households. About 43% using earthen walls and tin roof were better off financially. All the others belonged to the more well to do categories accounting for 19% in total. These households could afford more permanent structures built of tin, bricks and/or concrete walls and roofs.

2.1.3 Type of employment

Distribution of primary income and secondary income of the households have been organized in Fig: Ch.3 and Fig: Ch.4 in the ascending order of economic condition.

The main employment in the area is seen to be agriculture followed by business and service. Most of the day labourers also serve in the agriculture sector. However one important activity that has not been reflected in the survey results is selling of fuel wood since many people were careful not to mention it as a source of income. Discussion with residents from various of levels of the economy confirms that most of the people from low income households are engaged in the business of selling firewood. Promotion of other income generating activities is thus essential for persuading these people from destroying the remaining trees and plants in and around the sanctuary.

2.1.4 Household expenditure on fuelwood

The survey results show that the percentage of expenditure on fuel wood has a direct correlation with household income. The information given below is based on the monetary value of amount of fuel wood a family uses, instead of the exact amount of money spent. This estimation was needed because most of the residents collected their fuel wood from the forest and the sanctuary.

Distribution of households according to monthly expenditure is shown in Fig: Ch.5. The figure indicates that households from lower income range spent the highest percentage of their income on food and very little is spent for other areas like clothes, medicine etc. As the income level increases, expenditure for medicine, clothes and others facilities shows an increase. Expenditure on fuel wood for all the households is between 2 to 7 percent.

2.1.5 Household savings

Most of the people in Chunuti area are poor. Fig: Ch.6 gives an indication about the general economic condition of the households considering their savings pattern. Only 27% households reported to have some savings whereas the majority (79%) did not have any savings. On one hand this means that in future interventions, it may be necessary to organize credit (financial assistance) for the households to invest in energy saving devices like improved stoves. On the other hand, a habit of saving is essential for regular repayment of credit. Fig Ch.7 shows that 43% households had taken loan which had to be repaid, but the remaining 57% did not have any loan.

2.1.6 Source of credit

The survey results indicate that some of the households borrowed money from more than one sources. It was observed during Focus Group Discussions that large borrowers took loans from institutional sources whereas medium to smaller borrowers borrowed from non-institutional sources. Figure Ch.8 shows that 75% of the households borrowed from neighbours. Banks, NGOs, and relatives were the other important sources of credit.

2.1.7 Attitude towards use of alternative fuels

The survey and focus group discussions both indicated that most of the households would be interested in switching to alternative fuels if they were affordable and available. As Fig: Ch.9 shows, 90% of the households were willing to use alternative fuel. However the capability for spending extra money depended on their economic conditions. Fig: Ch.10 shows

the amount people were willing to pay per month for alternative energy technologies. It is seen that about 24% could not pay anything or less than 50 taka per month. To encourage energy savings, this group could be offered credit for purchase of pressure cookers. However about

48% could pay enough to buy much more efficient fuels such as kerosene, i.e. more than Tk201-500 per month. Most probably they are already spending about this much on fuelwood, unless using from land owned by them. This group could be assisted with credit for obtaining kero-stoves or other devices to help in their

switch over to the more efficient technology, in addition to fuel saving devices.

During the survey and focus group discussions residents were introduced to some of the available alternative energy technologies. Fig: Ch.11 shows the choice of 137 households.

88% of households showed interest in using improved stoves in place of their existing traditional stove. Because of unfamiliarity, comparatively smaller proportion of households were interested in other improved energy technologies, i.e. 19% for biogas, 6% for LPG, and 2% for briquettes. It is evident that preference for more than one alternative exist among the respondents, especially since improved stove is a choice for cooking device, while briquette is a choice for alternate fuel.

It should be noted that, for some of the alternative energy technologies such as improved stoves, biogas plants and LPG cylinders and stoves, each household would have to make some direct capital investment. Approximate investment needed for these are:

Table 2-1         Estimated Investment Cost for Households to Procure Energy Efficient Technologies

Type of technology Approximate costs involved
Improved stove Purchase cost- Tk. 100-200
  Reduction in fuel cost-at least 15%
LPG cylinder and burner Initial deposit and burner - Tk.2500
  Monthly cost – Tk. 400 approx.
Family size biogas plant Capital cost-Tk.15,000
  Very little recurring cost
Commercial unit using Capital cost-Tk. 400-500
improved stove and Reduced cost of fuel due to efficient
briquettes stove – at least 15%
Household use of No initial investment
briquettes Reduced cost of fuel due to efficient
  stove – at least 15%

 

Note: Generally the price of fuel wood and briquette is same in the study area.

2.1.8 Supply of biomass fuel

It may be observed from the Fig: Ch.16 in the next section that 99% of the households who reported use of fuel wood for cooking, may be using it fully or in conjunction with other biomass fuels. Generally the extraction of fuel wood is a cause of rural deforestation. It may however be mentioned that in all cases the whole tree is not used as fuel. The use of woody biomass depends on their economic value, for example, if a portion of a tree (trunk) may be used as timber, it will never be used as fuel wood. It may be mentioned that when a tree is felled due to natural disasters or for specific purposes (e.g. clearing of land, timber extraction, raw material extraction), only the branches and inferior components are graded as fuel wood. Fuel wood may be obtained from many different types of trees such as timber tree, fruit tree, Pharmaceutical tree, fuel wood tree or other trees. Among all these trees, fuel wood tree is solely used for fuel wood. When a particular household decides to plant trees, they try to optimize their income by planting appropriate types of trees. For example fruit trees (mango, jackfruit etc) are planted for getting seasonal fruit for the household as well as for cash sales. Pharmaceuticals trees are planted mainly for seasonal cash income. On the other hand timber trees are planted for long-term cash income. A matured timber tree is felled to meet the need of money during emergency needs (e.g. marriage). In rural areas timber tree and pharmaceutical trees are never extracted for fuel wood. They are felled at the end of their lifecycle and fuel wood is obtained as by product. But in rural areas located near the reserve forest area (common property resources), households generally depend on the trees located within reserve forest and fallow land owned by them (after plantation of food crops). These are generally planted with multi purpose trees (fruit tree, timber tree, pharmaceutical tree) to supplement their income. So the responses on tree plantation shown in Fig: Ch.12 gives an indication of the tree plantation behaviour of the households within their own land. Again, in the survey area (nearer to reserve forest), there are disputes with the title and ownership of land. The ownership right of a standing tree indicates the ownership of the land. People may agree to plant seasonal shrubs for using as fuel in seasonally available fallow (disputed land).

Fig: Ch.13 shows that 88% of the households are willingness to plant fuel wood trees to fulfil their own fuel wood needs. These may be trees or shrubs. Those households (12%) that responded negatively probably did not have any land to plant trees. Introduction of “dhaincha” for fuel wood supply on seasonal basis may be acceptable by majority of households since they could grow in the homesteads as well. The exhibition arranged during the study period in Chunuti confirms this view.

2.1.9 Betel leaf plantation

Betel leaf is a perennial seasonal cash crop that grows well in the area in and around the Chunuti WS. Financially solvent people own most of the betel leaf plantations in that area. These plantations require a significant amount of fencing and support for the climbing plants involving substantial investments. Most of the fences are made of bamboo sticks, fuel wood, and branches of trees are used as fencing material. After a year of use, these fencing

materials are used as fuel. Fig: Ch.14 shows that 22% of the households in the Chunuti area cultivate betel leaf.

Fig: Ch.15 shows the average expenditure for making fences for betel leaf field. On average each cultivator spends more than Tk.16,000 for making fences, shades and supports for betel leaf. To reduce the use of bamboo and other plants from the sanctuary, use of “dhaincha” as fencing material can be recommended. Dhaincha has the added advantage as a nitrogen

fixer for the soil, increasing fertility of the betel leaf crop.

2.2 Fuel Related Information: (Chunuti)

The survey carried out by PSL was designed to gain an idea about the way fuel wood collected from the area inside and surrounding Chunuti is integrated as a part of the life of the people. The main indicators used were the type of biomass used for cooking, their source and amount consumed, types of end use devices and their efficiency, alternatives available etc.

2.3.1 Types of fuel used for cooking:

Dependence of households on fuel wood in combination with various other types of fuels is shown in Fig:Ch16. Almost all households (99% of a total sample of 137 households) are found to use fuel wood. In addition to fuelwood, 75% households reported using leaves, 12% used crop residue, 9% used rice husk, 5% used sawmill residue, 15% used cow dung and 2 % of the respondents used other types of things as fuel.

For comparison, according to Population Census Sample Survey, 1991, BBS, in rural areas 42.67% of households use wood, 0.36% use kerosene, 0.20% use gas, 0.38% use electricity and 56.40% households use others residue types of fuel for cooking purposes. From the point of view of storability and burning quality, fuel wood is considered to be a premium fuel in comparison to other residue type fuels (crop residue, husk, sawmill residue etc). From biomass regulation point of view, these residue type fuels are more regenerative than fuel wood.

2.3.2 Consumption of fuelwood

Consumption of fuelwood depends mainly on the size of the family. This also depended on the general economic condition of the household since for poorer families it would probably not be possible to cook more than once a day. The main cooking would then be done in the afternoon for the night meal and the leftover would be consumed during the day. A difference in consumption of fuelwood in dry season and rainy season was also observed. During dry season people can use leaves and other parts of plants which is not suitable for the rainy season. Distribution of Households according to the amount of fuel wood used per day is given in Fig: Ch.17. It is observed that people collect more fuelwood during the dry season than in rainy season.

Average amount of fuelwood used per household in dry season and rainy season was found to be 10 kg/day and 14 kg/day respectively. This amounts to a per capita use of 450kg/person/year for dry season and 650 kg/person/year for rainy season.

2.3.3 Source of biomass fuel

Majority of the households collect biomass fuels for cooking either from their own sources or from common sources like the reserve forest area. Fig. Ch.18 shows the distribution of households according to sources of fuel. The groups under collected and purchased obtain all their fuelwood from the forest, which accounts for a total of 65% (33+7+15). Only 19% claim to use their own sources, probably the trees

grown in homesteads. The others also contribute to deforestation to some extent. In future, possibility of augmenting the supply of biomass fuel in nearby locations (within homesteads) may help to change their present habit of collecting fuel wood from reserve forest.

2.3.4 Type of cook stove

Typically all rural households in Bangladesh use earthen stoves made by the women themselves, using any kind of available and easy to burn biomass fuel in the open fire. These are very inefficient in terms of fuel use and produce large amounts of smoke all the time. The women sit on the floor while cooking while preparing the ingredients and sometimes looking after small children at the same time. Depending on the size of the kitchen and the season of use, the stoves are built indoors and outdoors. In Chunuti most of the households owned a single burner stove, as shown in Fig: Ch.19. Many households used 2 single burner stoves preferring the individual burning to a double burner stove. Information on the number and type of burners and their position (inside and outside the kitchen) will help selecting the numbers, position and types of improved stove for planning stove projects.

The figure shows that there were 182 one burner stoves located inside the kitchen and 56 two burner outside the kitchen in the 137 surveyed households. Of all the two burner stoves, 68

were located inside and 45 outside the kitchen. Only 3 homes used kerosene stoves and a single one used an LPG stove. This shows the extremely high dependence on biomass gathered from the environment for cooking energy.

2.3.5 Type of fuel used for lighting

From Fig: Ch.20 it is seen that majority of the households (93%)used kerosene for lighting purposes. According to Population Census Sample Survey, 1991, BBS, in rural areas 90.47% household use kerosene, 8.59% use electricity and 0.94% use other types of fuel for lighting facility. Proportion of households in Chunuti using electricity is less than national average. This may be due to the generally poor economic condition of the households in the area and thus the inability to afford the higher investment and recurring costs required for home electrification.

2.3.6 Household expenditure on lighting

Even though the quality of light is better in case of electricity than for kerosene wick lamps, most households use kerosene lamps. These are mainly uncovered wick lamps called kupi, and the more safer and efficient glass domed "hurricane" lamps. Fig: Ch.21 shows the monthly expenditure of per household for lighting fuel. Average monthly expenditure for kerosene is Taka 200 compared to Taka 300 spent for electricity. In the recent times the government has taken up several projects for home electrification using solar systems. Although the households

in the study area are poor, with a properly designed and implemented credit program, a substantial number could be brought under the Solar home system program.

2.3.7 Biogas as an alternative source of household energy

In rural Bangladesh, dried cow dung has always been used as a source of cooking energy. People dry the dung into small patties or on sticks and sundry for use in the rainy season. This gives a temporary solution for the energy problem, but results in destroying the natural land quality by depriving it of useful nutrients, which would have been recycled into the soil otherwise. Fig: Ch.22

indicates that although majority (66%) of the households use animal dung as fertilizer, about 26% use it both as fuel and fertilizer. About 5% of the households use dung as fuel at home and 2% sell it for income generation and use as fuel and fertilizer.

Fig: Ch 23 gives the distribution of households in the study area according to ownership of cattle. It is observed that 33% of the households didn’t own any cattle (cows, goats or buffalos), however, 17% owned 5 or more than 5 heads of cattle. Only this particular group may able to install biogas plant from the point of view of daily availability of dung to run a family

size biogas plant. Since these are the better off families, it might be worthwhile to convince them into investing in such an environment friendly solution for both energy and fertilizer needs, in addition to the benefit of cleaner environment.

2.3 Socio-Economic Information (Teknaf) : The survey results and visits to the Chunuti and Teknaf area have shown that there is no significant difference between the socio-economic and other economic behaviour such as energy use pattern of the residents. The results of the survey are therefore given here as charts only without repeating the discussions.

 

2.4 Fuel Related Information: (Teknaf)

Biogas as an alternative source of household energy

 

B. Wood Collection As An Occupation

Two types of wood collection processes were observed within the survey areas. The first one includes those who collect wood for their own needs. These people mostly collect the regenerative part of the trees. This collection process takes place on a daily basis. Their collection probably does not affect deforestation. On the other hand, the second group collects wood for commercial reasons. They are the illegal fellers who gather both the timber and all other parts of the trees. They are the main contributors to deforestation. As the wood collection from reserve forest is an illegal act, it is done covertly, and thus it is not possible to identify the exact number of people involved in wood collection. Considering the impact of wood collection process on deforestation and their importance in any program for sustainable management of forest, 15 persons involved in wood collection were identified and some information was gathered from them.

2.5.1 Wood collection is an occupation

The study area in Chunuti and Teknaf are part of a tropical evergreen forest standing for hundreds of years. People have harvested these resources over the years allowing natural regrowth. This was an important income generating activity for the local people all along It is within the last 20 years that the present unsustainable rate of deforestation started. 

Fig: W.1 shows that majority of the wood collectors interviewed are engaged in this activity for more than 10 years. In fact none of them started this occupation within the last 5 years indicating that during these years there were not many trees left in the forest for people to start a living.

Fig: W.2 gives the reasons cited for selecting wood gathering as an employment/business. Some of the interviewees seemed to

suffer from a guilty conscience because of their illegal actions. But lack of employment opportunity forced them to continue. 93% of the wood collectors reported lack of employment as the reason for their involvement. 47% admitted that they chose this occupation also because of high earning possibility. 7% thought this was an easy work to do.

 

2.5.2 Type of wood collected from the forest

The wood collected from the sanctuary and reserve forests are used mainly for two purposes,

i.e. as timber for construction and furniture, and for fuel. Fig: W.3 shows that 66% of the respondents reported that they collect both timber and fuel wood. 7% collect only timber wood and 27% collect only fuel wood. Actually a collector attempts to maximize his income through the collection process. It is known

80 60 40 20 0

% of wood fuel

Fuel w ood Timber w ood Both

collector

Types of w ood

from experience that timber wood is more valuable than fuel wood. So a collector would prefer to collect more timber wood than fuel wood to maximize his income. But the collection of timber wood involves felling of standing trees and it is more visible to the forest department and the society at large. The collection of timber wood is also constrained by the availability of mature trees. The forest department

% of fuel wood collector

often ignores collection of fuel wood from forest on head load basis. So in this context, the collectors enter into the forest with the objective of collecting whatever they can collect. Probably this is why the majority of the respondents reported to have collected both the fuel wood and timber wood.

 

2.5.3 Economics of wood collection

It was observed during the survey that the usual weight of a head load of fuel wood is about 20 to 25

40 30 20 10

0 1-50 51-100 101-150 151-200

Quantity(K.G)

kg. Depending

upon

availability, it takes about 3 to 4 hours to gather a head load of fuel wood. Fig: W.4 shows the typical quantity of fuel wood collected per day. If a person collects more than 2 head loads of fuel wood per day, he has to use a transporter for carrying them. So, in Fig: W.4, 73% of the collectors who collect more than 2 head loads i.e. more than 50 kg of fuel wood, probably engage vans to carry them.

Fig: W5 shows the distribution of monthly income of wood collectors. The average income is Tk.3,200. Thus it is seen that this activity can a earn enough for a family to stay at least above the poverty line. On the basis of wholesale price of Tk.1.50 per kg, the amount of wood collected by each of the groups shown in Fig. W5 are estimated to be 40-55 kg, 55-67 kg, 67-100kg, and over 100 kg per trip.

 

2.5.4 Seasonal variation in collection

For the convenience of gathering and drying, it is preferable to collect fuel wood in the dry season and 80% of the fuel wood is reported to be collected during that period. The remaining is collected in the rainy season. Since it is not essential to dry timber wood, 46% of the respondents reported its collection in rainy season and 27% of respondent in dry season. Fig: W.6 gives the preferred collection season for valuable wood.

2.5.5

Willingness to stop wood collection

When explained the negative effects of wood collection on the environment, 87% of the respondents expressed their willingness to stop wood collection since it is illegal as well as very hard work. The question then arises about the alternative source of income. As far as the collectors are concerned, this is their main source of income. So their worry is about earning their livelihood. As shown in Fig: W.7, when

asked about possibility of other occupations if wood collection is not allowed, 53% replied that they could work as day laborers, 13% could take up fishing, 7% could be employed in farming and 27% did not have any answer other than unemployment.

Chunuti Wild Life Sanctuary (WS)
seen from the Watch Tower

 

 

Denuded Wild Life Sanctuary

 

A young boy collecting biomass from the WS

 

Bamboo Stick Collected from WS

 

Rice
cultivation
inside WS

 

Betel Leaf Plantation in WS

 

Burned vegetation to make way for cultivation

 

Focus Group Discussion at Teknaf

 

Focus Group Discussion at Chunuti

 

Participatory garden in Chunuti

 

Cowdung Seller

 

Wood being collected for brick field

 

Loading of wood into Brick Kiln

 

Reserve of Wood in Brick Field

 

 

A tree dying in project area

 

Briquettes for sale in Lohagora

 

Briquette Making Machine

 

C. Commercial Units Using Cooking Fuel:

Two types of commercial units were surveyed in Chunuti and Teknaf to estimate their energy use pattern. These were 21 tea stalls and 1 hotel. These are the two main types of establishments using fuel for cooking in these areas. The tea stalls serve mainly tea and snacks, while the hotel serves full meals (rice, curry etc). In both types of commercial units, as there is an opportunity to pass on the fuel cost directly to the consumer, they mainly purchase appropriate types of fuels from the market. As shown in Fig: Com1, about 89% of the surveyed commercial units purchased fuel wood and the others collected it from the local area.

Fig. Com 2 shows that commercial units use both fuel wood and kerosene to meet their energy needs. Out of the 22 surveyed units, 32% reported use of fuel wood, 18% used kerosene and 50% used both fuel wood and kerosene. The choice depends on the convenience of the owner. Kerosene is more convenient than fuel wood from the point of view of starting a new fire. Because of that majority of commercial units reported using kerosene at the beginning of the day. In case of fuel wood, it takes time to ignite and generates smoke during burning. It also takes time to warm up the mud stove by burning fuel wood and it needs periodic cleaning of ash from the stove. For all these reasons, when there is a need of heavy heat load for longer duration, the users prefer to use wood stove. On the other hand, when the demand of heat load is intermittent and low to medium heat load is required, it is economical to use kerosene stove.

Fig. Com3 shows the expenditure made by commercial units on cooking fuel. On average the tea stalls spend 25 kg of firewood per day @ Tk.2/kg, and 3 ltr. of kerosene per day @ Tk.26 per ltr.

Depending on the nature of demand, owners of commercial units select the type and number of stoves in the commercial units. The choice of burners and their numbers depend on the business opportunities. Fig.Com 4 indicates that out of the 22 commercial units, 82% used one burner, 14% used two burners, 14% used three burner wood stoves and 68% used one burner kerosene stove. Actual use and number of stoves depend on business transactions.

D. Use Of Fuel Wood In Brick Fields:

Brick making is an energy intensive industry and consumes large quantities of fuel wood. It is a well-known fact that brick burning with fuel wood contributes to deforestation. The Government of Bangladesh enacted the Brick Burning (control) law in 1989 to ban the use of fuel wood for burning of bricks. A copy of the Act has been given at Annex-3. Even with the existence of such an act, because of easy availability of fuel wood in comparison to coal in many rural locations and lack of enforcement, brick industry owners continue to use fuel wood. In addition to contributing to deforestation, the brickfields in Chunuti and Teknaf areas are also cutting down hills for the earth required for brick making. Thus these are having a significant negative impact on the local environment. It may be mentioned that according to The Building Construction Act of 1952, cutting of hills is illegal. 

Since the owners of the brickfields usually belong to the powerful sections of the society, it was a sensitive issue for the study team to discuss with others and get information on actual use of fuel wood for brick industries. In Chunuti 5 brickfields out of 15 were surveyed and 1 out of 6 were surveyed in Teknaf. It was possible to obtain some information on field operations but data on amount of wood fuel or coal used could not be verified. Wherever the research team was doubtful about the authenticity of data, results obtained from previous surveys carried out in the country have been used. 

Industrial Operations:

Brick making is a seasonal industry. To take advantage of sun drying, brick industries operate during dry season (November to April). In specific locations operation of brickfields may vary from 4 to 5 months. Seasonal labors are hired to carry out various operations of brick industries such as extraction of clay, mixing of clay, molding, drying, burning, cooling, stacking and loading. Among different groups of labors, the person in charge of managing the kiln (controlling the firing operation) is considered as an expert craftsman.

The average number of months of operation of the studied brickfields in the previous years is about 4.5 months, as shown in Fig: B.1.  

Fig: B.2 shows the total number of bricks (in millions) produced in previous years as reported by the owners of the brickfields. The average number is estimated to be around 2.4 million. On this basis, the total production of bricks by all brickfields located in Chunuti and Teknaf is estimated as 50.4 million 

Working in the brickfields provides seasonal employment for a substantial number of people in the area. Fig: B3 shows the no of workers working in the 6 surveyed brickfields. Any initiative to move the brickfields to other areas should address this issue.

Replacement of fuel wood by coal

Information on use of fuel wood and coal for brickfields was not very reliable. When asked about the amount of fuel wood needed for burning 100,000 bricks the responses varied from 24 tons to 140 tons. Similarly for coal the response varied from 9 tons to 30 tons. According to the Bangladesh Energy Planning Project (BEPP), GOB 1985, requirement of fuel wood and coal is 76 tons and 30.48 tons respectively for 100,000 bricks. In the absence of reliable actual data the BEPP data can be used as the basis for comparison. This reference also states the specific energy coefficients for coal and fuel wood to be 7.44GJ/thousand bricks and 11.50GJ/thousand brick respectively. It can be inferred that the quantity of fuel wood required to burn bricks is almost double than that of coal. So a suggestion can be made to increase access to coal for these areas if brickfields are permitted at all.

The survey has found that the brickfield owners collect clay materials from local hillocks (50%) and from outside (50%). The location of all the surveyed brickfields is located inside the reserve forest area. But according to Brick Burning (control) law of 1989, no brickfield can be established within the 3 km area of the reserve forest area. Moreover, according to the law, it is illegal to use fuelwood in brick industries throughout Bangladesh.

So there are several reasons for not allowing brickfield around the sanctuary, game reserve and reserve forest areas.

Value of fuelwood used in and around the study area

Based on the cost of fuelwood and pattern of use by the households and commercial organisations in the area, an estimate has been made on the total value of fuelwood consumed in Chunuti and Teknaf area. The number of households and commercial units has been estimated on the basis of information provided in the Site Level Appraisal reports provided by the Nishorgo Support Project.

Table 2-2 Estimated value of fuelwood used in and around the study area per year

Chunuti area

Number of units

Consumption of fuel wood in Tons

 Value in Taka

Value in lac Taka (100,000)

Estimated number of households

 7,780

 

 

 

Household use in rainy season

 

    14,004

28,008,000

280

Household use in dry season

 

    39,211

78,422,400

784

Commercial use (tea stalls/restaurants)

60

   548 

   1,095,000 

11

Use in Brickfields

15

    27,360

54,720,000

547

Total :

 

    81,123

  162,245,400

  1,622

 

Teknaf area

Number of units

Consumption of fuel wood in Tons

 Value in Taka

 Value in lac Taka (100,000)

Estimated number of households

    21,142

 

 

 

Household use in season

 

    49,472

98,944,560

989

Household use in dry season

 

    60,889

  121,777,920

  1,218

Commercial use (tea stalls/restaurants)

60

   913 

   1,825,000 

18

Use in Brickfields

6

    10,944

21,888,000

219

Total :

 

  122,218 

  244,435,480

  2,444

 

Chapter 3         Energy efficient end-use devices and available appropriate renewable energy technologies 

One of the main purposes of this study is to recommend on energy efficient devices for the area to reduce the degradation of the forest, especially the Game Reserve and the Wildlife Sanctuary. The study has shown that 90-100% of the households and all the commercial units that work with cooking activities use fuelwood in a traditional way. For many of them the firewood is free, although it has to be collected by people. Even then the average amount of fuelwood used in the households is far more than in other parts of the country. Reducing wastages and improving efficiency in conversion of energy and switching to other types of fuel can help in loss of vegetation in the parks and the surrounding forests. Acceptance of any recommendations will depend on the success of awareness and promotional programs for introducing the technologies.

In recent years the emphasis of improved cook stoves programs have shifted from solely efficiency basis for saving fuel wood to more comprehensive sets of issues ranging from local health and environmental implications to global impacts associated with green house gas emissions. Experience in other countries has shown that for the success of cooking stove programs, the whole "cooking system" needs to be considered through integrated approaches. These should work simultaneously with technology innovation, creative financing and market development, and the monitoring of actual health and environmental benefits. The programs should also incorporate participatory approaches involving local women to correctly address users' priorities and preferences. This aspect of integrated development approach has to be kept in mind during any follow up activity taken up after this study.

The proposed technology interventions for the project are of the following types:

More efficient end use devices and appliance (improved stoves, pressure cookers, etc)
Making different types of conventional fuels available in the market (Kerosene or LPG stoves,
etc.) for people to chose from according to their capability and priority
Other appropriate technologies (bio gas plants, briquettes)
Cultivation/use of different kind of biomass fuels (dhaincha, fuelwood etc.)
Low cost solar dryer technology

 

During the exhibition held in Chunuti (20-21 March 2005) some of these items were introduced to the local people. Depending on the economic condition and individual requirements, the visitors showed interest in some or the other. Several designs of improved stoves have been promoted in Bangladesh by the Institute of Fuel Research & Development (IFRD) of Bangladesh Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR). Some of these and other designs developed by researchers around the world have been presented at Annex-3. Some of these are more energy efficient than others. But even for the less efficient, the reduction of indoor pollution suffered by the women and children from unburned biomass is an important positive outcome. To get the most benefit out of any subsequent cooking energy saving program, an initial review of the effectiveness of each of these options would need to be taken up.

In addition to improved stoves, the other viable technology of biogas could be investigated. More than 15% of the households owned enough cattle to run biogas plants. Since these are also the larger households, the amount of saving of wood fuel could be significant. In addition to cow dung used as raw material for biogas plants there was a scope of installing biogas plants using poultry droppings. These could be the owners of existing poultry farms or new entrepreneurs could be supported with micro credit to take up this activity instead of selling fuelwood/timber as a living.

Chapter 4         Awareness Program: Exhibition at Chunuti on Alternative Energy sources

Exhibition on Alternative Energy Options held at Chunuti

An outreach program was designed to introduce alternative energy options to the general population in and around Chunuti wildlife sanctuary. The objective of this exhibition was to initiate interest and awareness among the people to shift from firewood in particular, and to improve their energy usage pattern to more sustainable alternatives. Renewable and nonrenewable energy options were considered for alternative fuels.

The two-day event took place on March 21-22, at the field belonging to the local high school. Publicity for the event was done through letters of invitation to all the schools, colleges, UP office, Forest office, local elites and others. Posters in prominent places, and handbills were distributed along with microphone announcements at the local market. Copies of some of the information material distributed to the public are given in ANNEX- 4.

The program was attended by high level officials of the District Forest Department, local government officials, representatives of GTZ and Nishorgo support project, teachers and students from local colleges, schools and Madrasa, officials from the local NGOs and general public from surrounding areas.

From the beginning there was great excitement since this was the first time such an event took place in this area. People started to gather before starting the opening ceremony. Even though Chunuti is considered to be a conservative place, a large number of women came to visit the different stalls. They had a lot of queries about the availability of cost saving devices and supply of alternative fuels and various types of home based income generating activities. A large number of school and college going boys and girls came to the fair and showed their desire to learn about the displayed technologies. In general people had a great interest on the exhibits and would welcome affordable technologies if made available to reduce pressure on the forest.

Transport was arranged to bring women and men from interior villages to the exhibition area near the main market. The exhibition was a great success considering the number of people who turned out, and their mix. At least 5,000 people attended during the 2 days including housewives, students (both general and religious), children, local people, members of NGOs, educational institutions, and officials. To familiarise an available modern fuel, 200 kg of briquettes were distributed among the women visitors to try the new type of fuel at home. 

In the exhibition, improved stoves, kerosene stove, kerogas stove, LPG stove and solar cooker were displayed as examples of alternative energy technologies. On the other hand “Dhaincha”, briquettes and LPG cylinder were displayed as the alternative fuel source. Solar home system, portable solar lamps, solar water pump, solar water heater etc. were also displayed. The exhibits were mainly of three categories:

1. Alternative fuel and energy sources

2. Improved cooking devices (stoves)

3. Efficient appliances

 

Table 4-1 List of items displayed at the exhibition

Category

Items

 

1. LPG cylinder

ALTERNATIVE FUEL

2. Dhaincha stick

& ENERGY

3. Dhaincha seeds and plants

SOURCES

4. Briquettes

IMPROVED COOKING DEVICES

1. One burner earthen improved stove 2. Kerosene Stove 3. Kerogas stove 4. Gas cooker with cylinder

EFFICIENT

1. Pressure cooker

APPLIANCES

 

OTHER RENEWABLE ENERGY PRODUCTS

1. Portable LED lamps 2. Solar Systems for home lighting 3. Solar water pump 4. Solar water heater 5. Solar cooker

INFORMATION DOCUMENTS

1. Wall hangings and pictures on the problem of deforestation 2. Pictures of various types of alternative energy sources and appliances, e.g. biogas plants, solar driers, wind turbines, etc.

 

3. Booklets and pamphlets on alternative

 

energy 4. Booklets on income generating activities

 

Impact of the exhibition:

Financial benefit and access are the primary driving forces in the decision to shift between the alternative fuel types. However, convenience and time saving are also important to the people and environmental impact of the choice of fuel is not a priority today. It is expected that the outreach event will have some influence in the future, where the priorities will be shifted toward more environmentally friendly preferences. 

The impact of this outreach event can be classified according to the different income groups.

Higher income population has the choice of switching between the fuel types if adequate supply is available. The cost of moving between the fuel types is associated with the cooking device. Although the local market does not offer the alternatives, affordable choices of cooking devices are available to this income group within 50 km of Chunuti. These people often use multiple fuel and devices where firewood and kerosene are the main fuel currently being used.

Sufficient interest would be to switch to higher efficiency fuel like LPG, devices like the kerogas stove, efficient fuel like briquette, and efficient appliance like the pressure cooker. 

Middle-income population try to optimise their resources between the different categories of expenditure who prefer to spend more on a monthly basis with less initial investment. In addition to fuel price and its availability, they also include transport cost and time spent to procure the fuel on a regular basis. The possible switch would be from lower efficiency kerosene stove to a higher efficiency one, without much capital investment. Alternatively, households would be interested in using high efficiency (improved) clay stoves (with or without chimney) as a cost saving for their firewood and better indoor environment. 

Most of the poor and low-income population collect their cooking fuel. As it has been reported from the survey finding, only 7% of the people living around the sanctuary actually only buy their fuel wood on a daily basis. Since these households are poor, the possibility of purchasing alternatives is low among this income group. With sufficient effort and intervention, their fuel wood usage pattern can be changed to reduce their dependence of the sanctuary. A possibility is to reduce overall consumption of firewood by shifting to more efficient (improved) stoves. In addition, households with some space around their premises can plant firewood for their own consumption. Special type of very good fuel sticks called ‘Dhaincha’ was shown to the public at the exhibition, which has a short regeneration time of 3 months.

Table 4-2 Average Cost of alternative cooking devices

TYPE OF COOKING DEVICE

FIXED COST in Tk.

MONTHLY FUEL CONSUMPTION 

MONTHLY COST OF FUEL in Tk.

Single Burner earthen stove

50

 

360

Double Burner earthen stove

150 

 

480

Kerosene Stove(Type 1)

100

15 ltr.

390

Kerosene Stove(Type 2)

250

12 ltr.

312

Kerosene Stove(Type 3)

450

10 ltr.

260

Kero-Gas Stove

800

7 ltr.

182

LPG Stove

2750

1 cylinder of 25 kg

400-500

Solar Cooker

3000

 

0

 

Income generation is of foremost to the people in Chunuti, where job prospects are very few. Some books published by ITDG on income generating projects created much interest showing that people are interested in looking for other sources of income. 

There was request for a permanent exhibition in Chunuti from the academicians, the District Forest Officer (DFO) and other educated groups. There was also request for exhibitions like this in many other locations LGED project on Sustainable Rural Energy proposed that they could make a biogas plant for demonstration. NACOM, NSP, CODEC, Local Elites are deeply interested in a follow up of this event.

There was an unexpectedly high participation of women at the exhibition, reflecting great demand for alternative among the end users of cooking fuel.

Poster Board at Exhibition

 

Crowd of People in the Exhibition

 

 

Improved Stove and Kerosene Stove

 

Solar Water Pump

 

Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommendations 

Conclusions:

The main observation from the study is the general lack of awareness among the general public about the environmental degradation they are causing by over harvesting the natural resources. During the past several years of NSP project some of the educated people have began to understand the problem, but the majority are too busy with their day to day living using these resources to give the environment any consideration. The powerful people who are out of control of any law enforcing efforts are equally un-interested to stop their part in deforestation and degradation of the land. So different approaches are needed to tackle the different types of overuse of the natural resources. 

Based on the cost of fuelwood @Tk.2/kg, and pattern of use by the households and commercial organisations in the area (ref Table 2-2), an estimate has been made on the total market value of fuelwood consumed in Chunuti and Teknaf area. Part of the total amount may come from areas outside the immediate area, but this shows the demand that has to be met.  

Table 5-1 Annual Fuelwood consumption in and around Chunuti and Teknaf Parks

 

Consumption of fuel wood in Tons

Value in Taka

Chunuti

81,123

162,245,400

Teknaf

122,218

244,435,480

 

The experience from the study has shown that, once people understand the kind of pressure that is put on the immediate environment by their own behaviour, they are willing to look for alternatives. Thus it was felt that the demand for alternatives was high among the people, and suitable mechanisms to promote such alternatives can result in a successful transition. Financial intervention with micro-credit or other incentives can motivate and encourage people to switch to alternative fuels and efficient devices, which would ultimately reduce the pressure on the local resources.

The following observations have been made by the study team that need attention of the planners and policy makers. These may be taken up as part of the recommendations and the Action Plan given in the next section.

There is a need for awareness building at all levels of the population in the area. An energy service and information center on alternative energy options can be set up in Chunuti to promote technologies designed to reduce the growing pressure on the wildlife sanctuary. NSP could gain from hosting the center with more knowledge on the alternatives and maintaining some products for sale to the public. 

A training course on production of improve stoves with high efficiency will have quick and direct impact on the fuel consumption by the households in the area. Training can be offered to

some local entrepreneurs from the area, who would be interested to make a business for themselves by building these stoves for households in the local area. Proven designs suitable for the area, good trainers, along with a program of monitoring will be needed for this activity. Nishorgo project can offer to maintain the center for public interested in taking the training, for their own use and for commercial activity.

The urgent need for supplying Dhaincha seeds for growing the alternative of fuel can be done through the ‘energy service and information center’ or other existing outlet.  During the initial period seeds can be sold to the public at a reduced price to create interest.  Nishorgo agricultural extension could follow upon this. Similarly, commercial availability of briquette could be ensured with increasing demand. The private sector producer in Potia (20 km from Chunuti) could be encouraged to stock some briquette near the park areas. 

Awareness building was considered to be a key element by all the stakeholders interested in reducing deforestation. There was a request for a permanent exhibition in Chunuti from the academicians, the District Forest Officer (DFO) and other educated groups. There was also request for exhibitions like the one held in Chunuti in other locations.

Requests were made for demonstration of other renewable energy items for awareness building. The study team feels that this could be arranged in association with other organisations working in this field such as the Bangladesh Agriculture University, Agricultural Research institutes, etc. Most of the local people including NACOM, NSP, CODEC, and the local elite are deeply interested in a follow up of this event, which could make a long term impact of the two day demonstration. It is proposed that the priority items from the action plan be selected to prepare a strategy for future direction to be adopted by the Nishorgo Project.  

For wider impact, a demonstration village could also be developed with the help of other organisations where all the households within such a village would be using improved stoves, efficient fuel, or energy saving devices for cooking. Assistance could be provided to families in this village owning adequate number of cattle to install biogas plants.

The role of GTZ in future activities in this area may also be clarified at this stage. There is a scope for replication in wider scale and facilitation of focused interventions using renewable energy technologies, which can tap into the different global resources offered by international players. One such option could be using the CDM and GEF facilities for leveraging the local funds.

Recommendations

It has been observed during study visits that in the survey areas biomass fuels crisis have occurred due to unsustainable extraction of tree resources from reserve forest areas. There are many reasons for unsustainable tree extraction such as timber extraction for business, fuelwood extraction for business and own use, tree clearing for settlement & agriculture, extraction of forest products for earning income etc. Their resultant effects have contributed to deforestation and degradation of soils in denuded areas. Use of biomass fuels is a critical parameter and has both cause and effect relations with deforestation.

The following recommendations have been made with the objectives of achieving regenerative supply of biomass fuels and improving environmental conditions. These actions also have prospects of creation of employment and improving the quality of life.

•           Prohibition of illegal use of fuelwood in brick industries within reserve forest areas.

•           Creation of awareness among development planners about the action programmes on
sustainable development.

 

•           Creation of awareness among local population for sustainable living.

•           Establishment of Energy Service and  Information Centre.

•           Augmentation of supply of biomassfuels (e.g. tree plantation, dhaincha cultivation)

•           Conservation of biomassfuels through promotion of efficient energy consuming technologies

(e.g. improved cooking devices),

•           Substitution of biomassfuels with kerosene and LPG,

•           Conservation of biomass fuels through promotion of efficient biomassfuels conversion
technologies (e.g. briquetting machines, biogas digestors),

 

•           Establishment of a demonstration village for awareness building on energy technologies.

•           Promotion of small energy businesses.

•           Capacity building of local population

•           Innovative financing for access to alternative fuel and technologies

•           Organisational issues for implementation of project

 

The above mentioned action programme should not be considered as short-term one time measures, but it will have to be considered under medium to long-term time horizon as integral part of usual development activities. Considering critical environmental condition of the survey areas, implementation of above mentioned projects should be considered simultaneously. Strategies to be followed in implementation of the recommendations are presented below.

5.1 Creation of Awareness 

5.1.1 Legal Action against Illegal Use of Fuelwood for Brick Burning 

According to Brick Burning Control Law of 1989, the use of fuelwood for brick burning is banned throughout the country (Article 5). Moreover, it is illegal to construct Brick Kilns within three kilometres of Reserve Forest areas (Article 4). 

Seminars and discussion meeting should be organized at Thana level to draw the attention of the law enforcing agencies and the stakeholders to take appropriate actions as prescribed in the law. The copy of the law may be distributed among the participants. Permanent billboards stating the various laws on protection of the forest and regulations on location of brickfields can be put up in appropriate locations. Social pressure against deforestation could also be created through appropriate awareness program involving local elite, schools, voluntary organisations, NGOs and others.

5.1.2 Creation of Awareness Among Development Planners

Periodically national experts may be invited as resource persons to participate in discussion meetings and seminars organized for creating awareness among developments planners (e.g. GO, NGOs, CBOs) working at the Thana level.

5.1.3 Creation of Awareness Among the Beneficiaries

Discussion meetings and video presentations may be organized in public places like local colleges, schools and clubs to create awareness about sustainable supply of biomassfuels.

5.1.4 Establishment of an Energy Service and Information Centre

Establishment of an Energy Service and Information Centre (ESIC) at project site would help in keeping the stakeholders informed about different technologies that may be used to attain sustainable level of production of biomass. This centre may be attached to NSP/CODEC office at the project site.

5.2 Promotion of Technologies

5.2.1 Plantation of Trees and Marketing of Dhaincha seeds

The nurseries of the Forest Department and other organisations in the project area can raise seedlings on a continuous basis for supply to households and local markets. The local NGOs can organise their beneficiaries to raise seedlings as part of their income generating activities.

In Bangladesh, Dhaincha is generally grown in seasonal fallow lands located in fuel scarce regions (Rajshahi division) of the country to augment biomassfuel supply and to improve soil condition. During field exhibition (held on 20-21 March, 2005), local population expressed their keen interest about Dhaincha cultivation to augment the supply of biomassfuels. Dhaincha seeds procured from other parts of the country (especially the tall variety) may be packed in small bags and marketed through local grocery shops and nurseries. It is envisaged that after initial 2-3 years, seeds produced locally may be used in subsequent production. Sustained supply of Dhaincha seeds for at least 2 years is a pre-requisite for the success of this intervention.

5.2.2 Installation and Marketing of Improved stoves

Domestic use: Several designs of improved stoves for household use have been given in Annex- 3. Initially a proven design can be taken up for promotion using short training courses and implementation. NGOs with experience in such programs can be contacted for the

purpose. PSL has also developed an efficient portable stove that can be fabricated and marketed by intending entrepreneurs. However it has to be remembered that like any new technology, improved stoves will require some time to get users’ acceptability (dissemination). Inability to take this into consideration can result in total failure of the efforts. NSP can begin with taking applications for a 2 day training course to measure the level of resources needed in both locations. Availability of micro-credit fund will enable poor households to afford the cost of improve stoves.

Commercial use: Commercial units (e.g. tea-stalls an restaurants) are in a better position to spend more on energy saving devices of commercial size improved stoves. So with proper credit programs they can be persuaded to adopt the technologies. Because of available cash, they are also more likely to use technologies like briquettes.

5.2.3 Use of Efficient Appliances Some simple devices like pressure cookers can be great fuel and time saver for both households and commercial units. Small loans for purchase of these in instalments can ultimately reduce the demand for fuelwood. Local hardware shops can be encouraged to stock these products. Micro-credit funds for households for procurement of the appliances will be an incentive.

5.2.4 Marketing of Kerosene stoves, LPG Cylinders and burners

 

Partial substitution of biomass fuels with kerosene and LPG can have a positive effect on preserving the forest resources. The end use devices are also more efficient than the traditional firewood stoves. Various types of kerosene and LPG using devices such as (a) Domestic kerosene cookers; (b) Pressurized kerosene cookers for home and commercial users (e.g. hotels & restaurants) (c) LPG burners for domestic and commercial users are available in the more developed markets near the project areas. Those who can afford the technologies can be assisted to invest in these by offering credits for hire purchase.

The country has an extensive distribution network of petroleum products. Many of which extend to towns near the project area. With some efforts from the project, these networks can be utilised for maintaining adequate supply of the fuels (e.g. kerosene and LPG) for the households and commercial units. Linkage with the private sector and local entrepreneur(s) as dealers for the marketing of kerosene and LPG is critical for the success of this intervention.

5.2.5 Manufacturing and Marketing of briquettes 

Briquettes made from rice husk are commercially available throughout the country and are used in place of fuelwood. Traditionally paddy is not parboiled in Chittagong and Chittagong HT regions. As a result, there is good prospect for the availability of rice husk for briquetting units. Local entrepreneur(s) may be encouraged to start a business of briquette making by providing the technology and assistance in marketing.

Existing manufacturers and dealers of briquette from adjacent towns could be contacted for extending their services to Chunuti and Teknaf. Local entrepreneur may be encouraged with incentives to hold supply of briquettes in their outlets for selling to the local market. Once a steady demand is created

5.2.6 Biogas technology

Biogas can provide a steady supply of cooking gas for families owning adequate number of cattle. Dung from 5-6 cattle is needed to operate a family size biogas plant. It has been proven as a viable technology in many areas of the country. Effluents from toilets can also be used as a source of feed materials for biogas plants. The well off families can be encouraged to invest in household size biogas plants by providing the technology and training in installation and maintenance.

5.2.7 Marketing Solar Home Systems 

Small size solar lighting systems and efficient appliances can be made available to the retail stores (on credit financing from the project) for households in unelectrified areas. Some established NGOs have their solar projects in the Cox’s Bazar district who may be interested in using local energy entrepreneurs for marketing.

5.2.8 Establishment of Demonstration Village

Establishment of a Demonstration Village using different promotional technologies would be helpful in popularising (disseminating) the technologies in the project area. 

5.3 Capacity Building

Periodic training programmes should be organized at local level for different groups of stakeholders for the implementation of different sub-projects (e.g. improved cook stoves) mentioned in above paragraphs. Considering the important roles played by women in managing domestic cooking fuels, women should be given preference in introducing improved devices to be used at household level. 

5.3.1 Training on Promotion of Improved Biomass Fuel Stoves

With technical assistance from Institute of Fuel Research and Development (IFRD), BCSIR and Village Education Resource Center (VERC), Savar, selected women entrepreneurs may be given training to construct improved stove(s) at household level on payment basis. IFRD’s assistance may also be sought for constructing improved stoves in commercial units (e.g. restaurants, tea-stalls).

5.4 Provision of Financing

All project activities and sub-activities are subject to availability of financial resources. Necessary finance is to be mobilized for the following purposes:

(a) Implementation of awareness creation activities

(b) Establishment of Energy Service and Information Centre

(c) Promotion of energy efficient technologies and appliances

(d) Establishment of small enterprises

(e) Implementation of capacity building program

(f) Provision of micro credit

 

5.5 Provision of Micro-credit

Availability of micro-credit for procurement of energy efficient technologies will jump start initial dissemination of the devices. Therefore micro-credit can play a key role in the success of a follow up project . a) A one time loan of Tk.100 can be made available to 15,000 poor households interested

to install improved clay stoves.

b)         A loan of Tk.500-1000 per family for 1000 households for purchasing pressure

cookers. c) A loan Tk 800 per family for 2000 households to procure kerogas stoves. d) A loan of Tk. 3000 per family for 200 households to procure LPG cylinder and burner e) In addition, 5 micro enterprises may be provided with loans of Tk. 50,000 or more to

initiate business on energy efficient devices in the local area.

5.6       Organisational Aspects

a)         Interactive and coordinated actions of DFO, GTZ, NSP, CODEC, professional experts and the local beneficiaries would be necessary to implement programs for achieving sustainable development of the project areas.

b)         Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers’ Association (BELA), a nationally reputed environmental NGO should be involved to create awareness for taking Legal Action against illegal use of fuelwood for brick burning.

c)         Forest Department will continue its usual programme of forestry development

d) Individual households may be encouraged to undertake production of Dhaincha as a seasonal fuelwood crop.

e)         Relevant petroleum fuel marketing company/companies (Padma, Meghna, Jamuna) should be contacted to appoint some local entrepreneur(s) as dealers for the marketing of kerosene and LPG.

f)          Some local entrepreneurs may also be encouraged to undertake marketing of kerosene and LPG using devices: (a) Domestic kerosene cookers; (b) Pressurised kerosene cookers for commercial users (e.g. hotels & restaurants); (c) LPG burners for domestic and commercial users.

g)         Institute of Fuel Research and Development (IFRD), BCSIR and Village Education Resource Center (VERC) etc should be involved for the promotion of improved wood burning stoves.

h)         The Institute of Fuel Research and Development (IFRD), BCSIR and Local Government Engineering Department (LGED) may be involved in installation of biogas plants in locations having adequate supply of raw materials (e.g. animal dung).

i)          NGOs working in the area on Solar PV should be involved in the promotion of the technology in the unelectrified parts.

j)          Local NGOs operating micro financing activities should be provided with necessary funds to support different sub-projects (e.g., improved stoves, dhaincha seed distribution, bio-gas, solar PV, LPG cylinders, LPG stoves, kerosene stoves, kerogas stoves)

k)         Donor support would be necessary to provide funds for different action programs and credit for promotion of technologies.

Proposed Action Plan: Table 5-1 shows the proposed Action Plan with a schedule for implementation of the activities mentioned in this report and possible stakeholder participation. The timeframe takes into account the necessity of long term commitment required for success of such projects. Priority level has been determined by the expected scale of the impact, qualitative significance of the output and timing considerations.

 

 

 

On the backdrop of the above, NSP and the GTZ project Promotion of the Use of Renewable Energies (PURE) agreed to carry out an assessment of the energy use pattern and the energy demand/supply situation of households, commercial and industrial enterprises for selected national parks and provide recommendations on promoting efficiency improvement of energy end-use devices and fuel switching options, which are acceptable and affordable for the inhabitants in and around the parks and contribute to reduced exploitation of forest resources.

PURE shall provide the technical expertise (consultants) for the appraisal.

Scope of work

Presently, the NSP focuses its attention on the following parks/sanctuaries:

1) Teknaf Game Reserve

2) Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary (CHT)

3) Rema Kalenga Wildlife Sanctuary

4) Lawachara National Park

In the first phase the appraisal shall be carried out for the Teknaf Game Reserve and Chunati Wildlife Sanctuary (CHT). Based on the results the appraisal may be extended to cover the other two parks.

The scope of the appraisal shall include  appropriate surveys, which will be used to assess and evaluate the patterns of (fuel) wood use by households and small industries in and around the target area

¾         recommendations on promotion of appropriate upgrading of energy end-use devices and/or fuel switching options without straining the socioeconomic situation of inhabitants in the target areas, but rather contributing to improvement of their quality of life, including improvement of their health situation

Tasks

The following tasks need to be performed by consultants:

1.         Conduct a sample survey of the present energy use patterns of households and, if applicable, commercial and industrial enterprises in and around the selected national parks and specify the sources of energy used, quantify the energy used, and describe the energy end-use devices employed

2.         Assess in particular the use and source of supply of firewood. In addition, establish present practices of harvesting and, if applicable, trading of wood (formal, informal)

3.         In cooperation with DoF assess the ecological impact of the present practice of harvesting of (fire-)wood in the respective national parks

4.         Propose options for fuel switching and upgrading of energy devices/technologies and describe the technical/financial/social constraints that might hinder acceptance of new or improved energy devices and/or fuel switching

5.         Design a pragmatic strategy for promotion of effective fuel switching and upgrading of energy devices/technologies in the target areas

 

Remarks on implementation/cooperation

Whenever possible, NSP and the DoF will provide the services of their local infrastructure for the field work in the park areas. DoF/NSP will provide forest-related expertise (e.g. for Tasks 2 & 3).

eog/03-11-04

ANNEX-2

 

Laws on Forest, Construction and Brickfields

1. Brick Burning (control) Law, 1989

 

2. Forest Act Law, 1927

 

3. The Building Construction Act, 1952

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANNEX-3

 

Some designs of improved stoves used around the world

WINIARSKI’S ROCKET STOVE:

 

Efficiency: 12-42%. The efficiency depends on type of a heat exchanger used.

Construction: Simple to construct with a number of different materials.  The simplest Rocket Stove can be built with thick tin cans and wood ash (5,000 of these were built in refugee camps in Zaire).    Life expectancy: Is 2 weeks to ten years depending on the materials used.                                Materials: The Rocket elbow can be made from different materials to improve its durability. Sand/clay (Lorena), pumice/concrete, heavy steel pipe, 430 stainless steel or special heat resistant ceramic can be used.  

WORKING PRINCIPLE: Rocket Stove Principle:

1) Insulate, particularly the combustion chamber, with low mass, heat resistant materials in order to keep the fire as hot as possible and not to heat the higher mass of the stove body.

2.) Within the stove body, above the combustion chamber, use an insulated, upright chimney of a height that is about two or three times the diameter before extracting heat to any surface (griddle, pots, etc.).

3.) Heat only the fuel that is burning (and not too much). Burn the tips of sticks as they enter the combustion chamber, for example. The object is not to produce more gasses or charcoal than can be cleanly burned at the power level desired.

4.) Maintain a good air velocity through the fuel. The primary Rocket stove principle and feature is using a hot, insulated, vertical chimney within the stove body that increases draft.

5.) Do not allow too much or too little air to enter the combustion chamber. We strive to have stoichiometric (chemically ideal) combustion: in practice there should be the minimum excess of air supporting clean burning.

6.) The cross sectional area (perpendicular to the flow) of the combustion chamber should be sized within the range of power level of the stove. Experience has shown that roughly twenty-five square inches will suffice for home use (four inches in diameter or five inches square). Commercial size is larger and depends on usage.

7.) Elevate the fuel and distribute airflow around the fuel surfaces. When burning sticks of wood, it is best to have several sticks close together, not touching, leaving air spaces between them. Particle fuels should be arranged on a grate.

8.) Arrange the fuel so that air largely flows through the glowing coals.Too much air passing above the coals cools the flames and condenses oil vapors.

9.) Throughout the stove, any place where hot gases flow, insulate from the higher mass of the stove body, only exposing pots, etc. to direct heat.

10.) Transfer the heat efficiently by making the gaps as narrow as possible between the insulation covering the stove body and surfaces to be heated but do this without choking the fire. Estimate the size of the gap by keeping the cross sectional area of the flow of hot flue gases constant. EXCEPTION: When using a external chimney or fan the gaps can be substantially reduced as long as adequate space has been left at the top of the internal short chimney for the gasses to turn smoothly and distribute evenly. This is tapering of the manifold. In a common domestic griddle stove with external chimney, the gap under the griddle can be reduced to about one half inch for optimum heat transfer.

This elbow is then placed inside of a container that is filled with insulation . The container can be made from almost any material. We have used 5 gallon drums, brick, clay, cement. For insulation we suggest using wood ash or pearlite, or pumice,. Do not use massive things such as earth, sand,or cement. These will rob heat from the stove and reduce your combustion efficiency. For optimal use we recommend a 9" chimney and a 4" fuel feed magazine.

The Rocket stove is an improvement over the three stone fire but it is only one part of the equation. In order to really save fuel wood we must maximize the heat transfer to the pot.

Clay used for HENYA stove HENYA stove

ADVANTAGES:

• Less smoke

• Wood conserving

• Clean cooking conditions

• Long lasting

• Affordability

• Portability

• Stability (sufficiency)

• Charcoal, firewood, corn cobs and other dry rubbish could be used.

 

As a product, the Upesi stove has had a widespread impact in Kenya, while other types of improved stove, adapted for local needs, are used in many other developing countries.

The technology is relatively straightforward. What makes the Upesi a success is the way in which nontechnical issues including the use of the market, the participation of the community, entrepreneurial training and skills development have been addressed as part of the development approach to the technology.

Stoves commercialization

The community is actively involved in the manufacture and promotion of stoves, which are sold commercially on the open market.

 A paddle is used to The Rural Stoves West Kenya project has trained 13 get the correct thickness

The Upesi stove for households in Kenya

Biomass for cooking: improving energy efficiency, environment, employment and health

Around half the world’s population relies on biomass for their energy needs. Biomass includes fuel wood and organic waste. It is the major source of renewable energy.

Most of this biomass is used for cooking on open fires or poorly constructed stoves, usually inside the house. This leads to very inefficient fuel use and a high level of indoor air pollutants.

One of the simplest, most immediate ways to improve the quality of life for those using biomass as a fuel is to provide access to improved stoves. The Upesi stove, developed by ITDG with its partners in East Africa, is

women’s groups (approximately 200 people) to make of clay which is improved stoves. As well as production training, the important to the stove’s women gain skills in business management, including durability, Kenya. marketing.

 The Upesi stove

made of clay and fired in a kiln. The design allows it to

reduces smoke levels

burn agricultural residues as well as wood, such as waste The training is participative. Women identify their own

bringing health benefits

from sugar cane.

training needs, devise the programmes and control

for users, Kenya.

their pace.

The annual production is estimated at 10 000 to 11 000 stoves, and the profit generated by the stoves provides artisans with a higher than average rural wage. As a result, the women involved have gained status, self-confidence and financial independence.

The empowerment of the women was also instrumental in achieving an improved kiln for making the stoves. ITDG worked with three groups of women potters to design and test prototypes. Their involvement created a forum where they could also learn how to construct and use the kiln.

The project continues to pilot new approaches to commercialization. It is currently working to improve the linkages between potential stove users and producers by identifying and training intermediary marketing groups, thereby encouraging key players to market

Simon Ekless

The Upesi stove benefits poor people in several ways:

● It can halve the amount of fuel wood needed by a household. This reduces drudgery and improves the sustainability of fuel wood resources.

● It provides employment. About 10 000 stoves per year are made and sold in West Kenya alone.

● It alleviates household smoke.

 

ITDG has also introduced a new design of kiln which has substantially reduced the fuel needed to make the stoves and the scrap levels from stoves cracking during firing.

8 Technology...is only half the story Technology...is only half the story 9

themselves more efficiently, promote the benefits and expand consumer choice.

Business services

The technical training of the women, by itself, would not have been sufficient to achieve success. Training on group organization, management, marketing and business skills was crucial, particularly because the aims of the project focused on the benefits to producers and the development of a commercial market for stoves.

 The initial market for the Upesi was developed at a time when similar stoves were being subsidised, leading to artificially low prices and unequal competition. A key target was to create a market with a more realistic pricing structure reflecting real production costs.

Marketing awareness among the producers also fed back into the technical training. The Upesi had to be a high quality product, because the market had been damaged by stoves of inconsistent quality. Although a higher production standard may initially appear to raise prices, in fact people with little money need to have confidence that what they do buy is reliable. A further business service which was crucial to this project was the establishment of a strong network of the key actors – producers, installers and retailers of the stove – and the effective dissemination of information and knowledge between them. For small scale producers the lack of information and knowledge, every bit as much as economic mechanisms, constitutes a major barrier to use of the market.

Pollution reduction

When biomass is used inefficiently, it produces high levels of particulates which are a major contributory factor in several potentially life-threatening diseases. Household smoke is the major cause of death for children under five, worldwide (WHO: Health and Environment in Sustainable Development, Geneva 1997).

ITDG is working in Kenya to determine the best, most cost-effective ways to reduce levels of smoke in the homes of rural poor people. The levels of smoke in the kitchen are being monitored over a typical day for fifty homes in a ‘before-and-after’ study, in which the benefits of windows, eaves space, smoke hoods and improved stoves will be statistically evaluated.

Improved stoves can be a key contributor to reducing particulate levels in households – though other adaptations to reduce fuel use and smoke levels are also required.

By working at household level, ITDG hopes to extend the range of benefits to people’s quality of life which the improved stove can offer.

The Upesi stove is a good example of the benefits of working closely with a community to find out what type of stove best suits their lifestyle. Its high level of adoption reflects this success.

 8. Like many rural women in developing countries, this women carries the burden of firewood collection, Zimbabwe.

 As well as being end users, women in this project benefit from manufacturing and selling the stoves. Keyo, Kenya.

10 Technology...is only half the story Technology...is only half the story 11

A

ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE -Ø4In, HT 10FT

B

CHIMNEY SUPPORT - BRICK WITH SOIL MORTAR

C

VESSEL SEATING OPENINGS

D

CAST IRON GRATE - (15CM X 15CM X 1CM THK)

E

ASH PIT

F

( SOIL MORTAR+ WASTE BURNT BRICK POWDER

 

+ CEMENT MORTAR ) FILLING

 

NOTE :

1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN CM

2. DRAWING IS NOT TO SCALE

3. TO MAINTAIN DIMENSION STANDARDS IN CONSTRUCTION OF STOVES, A METAL  MOULD COULD BE USED

 

ELEVATION

IMPROVED 'SARALA' STOVE

ANNEX-4

Some Information Materials Distributed at the Chunuti Exhibition

 

 Last Updated:  18 December, 2008